78 Results
filtered by...
Filter
View Types > Datasets
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
78 Results
filtered by
View Types > Datasets
Clear All
This dataset provides the *planned* EU allocation to categorisation system codes as adopted in ERDF, CF and ESF programmes at the end 2008 and the end of 2015.
The values at the moment of closure of the period 2007-2013 are provided in this dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/ESIF-2007-2013-categorisation-raw-data-from-closur/qt3c-wiyg
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to a categorisation dimension codes. The programme documents only provided planned financial information on three dimensions, namely;
- Priority themes (actions supported)
- Form of Finance (grants, loans, etc.)
- Territorial context (urban, rural, etc.)
- Priority themes (actions supported)
- Form of Finance (grants, loans, etc.)
- Territorial context (urban, rural, etc.)
The full categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Information on the last two dimensions was not provided in the programmes but only in the annual reporting.
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Information on the last two dimensions was not provided in the programmes but only in the annual reporting.
This data is of interest because it allows an analysis of time of the planned use of the EU support by 3 different dimensions. I show the detailed changes in thematic allocation between 2008 and 2015 allowing to look re-progamming.
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,190
The categorisation system for Cohesion Policy Funds 2014-2020 (ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund) foresees 123 Intervention Field codes for the actions or activities financed by the three Funds. The planned allocation to those codes provide detailed thematic / sectoral information on the planned investments by theme.
The planned financial allocations are to be found in this dataset https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/dataset/ESIF-2014-2020-categorisation-ERDF-ESF-CF/9fpg-67a4
This lookup dataset maps the 123 intervention field codes to higher level "cross cutting" themes such as "climate change", "innovation" "enterprise support" and others combinations. It provides the Commission"s recommend list of codes to be used when assessing the financial allocations to these cross cutting themes.
The dataset also identifies the codes that are taken into account for the tracking of Climate change action along with the weightings applied.
The dataset also identifies the codes that are taken into account for the tracking of Climate change action along with the weightings applied.
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,178
This dataset provides the raw cumulative categorisation data on the projects selected for support as reported in the 322 ERDF/CF programme annual Implementation reports (AIR) as at end 2014. The dataset is not a final picture of what was financed during 2007-2013. The values at the moment of closure of the period 2007-2013 are provided in this dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/ESIF-2007-2013-categorisation-raw-data-from-closur/qt3c-wiyg
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
This raw data is of interest because it allows cross analysis of the different dimensions to answer questions such as:
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,170
This dataset provides the raw cumulative categorisation data on the projects selected for support as reported in the 322 ERDF/CF programme final implementation reports (FIR) as presented in the closure documeantation. The dataset is the best approximation of thematic content of what was financed during 2007-2013.
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
This raw data is of interest because it allows cross analysis of the different dimensions to answer questions such as:
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
A version of this data as at the end of 2014 was previously published here: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-Categorisation-Projectselection-/b5xq-38ds
The planned categorisation amounts under certain dimension were also published in dataset for end-2008 and end-2015 : https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/SF-2007-2013-Categorisation-Planned-2008-and-2015/x2d8-jjj2
Updated
October 6 2021
Views
996
Updated
October 23 2018
Views
858
Updated
June 15 2020
Views
837
This report provides an overview and details of the latest version adopted by EC or MS of the Operational Programmes (OP) in SFC2014 Front Office. It also displays the increase/ decrease of the EU Amount between two dates.
Parameters:
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention codes : 053, 081, 107 and 112
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention codes : 053, 081, 107 and 112
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
Updated
October 6 2021
Views
801
The data available provides ** VALUES BY PROGRAMME ** for outputs under 18 core indicators reported by over 300 ERDF/CF programmes across the EU.
[The aggregated country achievements values for the 4 years 2012-2015 are provided in a separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/dataset/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-achievements-core-Indicators-tot/w9mt-s8si ]
Last data update: March 2018.
[The aggregated country achievements values for the 4 years 2012-2015 are provided in a separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/dataset/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-achievements-core-Indicators-tot/w9mt-s8si ]
Last data update: March 2018.
The values reported relate to achievements tracked in monitoring systems as reported by projects financed with EU investments in the period 2007-2015.
For three Member States - Croatia, Romania and Slokavia - the final values may include projects finances also in 2016 under specific provisions; in those cases the final values are nonetheless reported as "2015" in order to allow aggregation.
For three Member States - Croatia, Romania and Slokavia - the final values may include projects finances also in 2016 under specific provisions; in those cases the final values are nonetheless reported as "2015" in order to allow aggregation.
1. BACKGROUND:
After the negotiations on the ERDF and Cohesion Fund operational programmes (OPs) for 2007-2013, the Commission recommended the use of 'core indicators' for the main intervention areas. Core indicators can be used to compare and aggregate data across similar priorities or measures. Reporting on core indicators was not a legal obligation in 2007-2013. As a pilot, voluntary exercise it allowed the Member States (MS) and the Commission to establish reporting routines and detecting practical reporting issues. The effort undertaken to report against core indicators has improved accountability in the use of the Funds. Strategic reports were submitted by the MS twice in the course of the programming period (in 2009 and 2012), including core indicator data to communicate progress towards achieving policy objectives. Thanks to the use of core indicators, this was the first programme period in which indicator data could be aggregated and analysed across programmes.
After the negotiations on the ERDF and Cohesion Fund operational programmes (OPs) for 2007-2013, the Commission recommended the use of 'core indicators' for the main intervention areas. Core indicators can be used to compare and aggregate data across similar priorities or measures. Reporting on core indicators was not a legal obligation in 2007-2013. As a pilot, voluntary exercise it allowed the Member States (MS) and the Commission to establish reporting routines and detecting practical reporting issues. The effort undertaken to report against core indicators has improved accountability in the use of the Funds. Strategic reports were submitted by the MS twice in the course of the programming period (in 2009 and 2012), including core indicator data to communicate progress towards achieving policy objectives. Thanks to the use of core indicators, this was the first programme period in which indicator data could be aggregated and analysed across programmes.
2. USING THE DATA:
The data is provided by programme in annual cumulative time series 2012-2015 where values were reported. Annual value can be compare but **SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED** as they are already cumulative.
The data is provided by programme in annual cumulative time series 2012-2015 where values were reported. Annual value can be compare but **SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED** as they are already cumulative.
3. SCOPE OF THE DATA:
As part of the ex-post evaluation the reported indicators values for 2012 and 2013 available were examined in 2014-2015 by independent consultants. The synthesis report of their work (March 2015) is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#1
The values for 2014 and 2015 were established by DG REGIO by comparing the values reported by the programme authorities for those years with the work of the consultant on the values reported for 2012 and 2013 and compiling a picture of the progress. The 2015 data is derived from the final report programme reports received in March 2017.
The following is the list of "core indicators" that were examined and can be found in the dataset when used and reported by the programmes:
CO04 Number of RTD projects (N° projects)
CO05 Number of cooperation project enterprises-research institutions (N° projects)
CO06 Research jobs created (FTE)
CO07 Number of direct investment aid projects to SME (Number)
CO08 Number of start-ups supported (Enterprises)
CO09 Jobs created in SME (gross, full time equivalent) (FTE)
CO12 Additional population covered by broadband access (people)
CO14 km of new roads (km)
CO15 km of TEN roads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO16 km of reconstructed roads (km)
CO17 km of new railroads (km)
CO18 km of TEN railroads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO19 km of reconstructed railroads (km)
CO24 Additional capacity of renewable energy production (MW)
CO25 Additional population served by water projects (people)
CO26 Additional population served by waste water projects (people)
CO29 Area rehabilitated (km2)
CO35 Number of jobs created in tourism (FTE)
CO04 Number of RTD projects (N° projects)
CO05 Number of cooperation project enterprises-research institutions (N° projects)
CO06 Research jobs created (FTE)
CO07 Number of direct investment aid projects to SME (Number)
CO08 Number of start-ups supported (Enterprises)
CO09 Jobs created in SME (gross, full time equivalent) (FTE)
CO12 Additional population covered by broadband access (people)
CO14 km of new roads (km)
CO15 km of TEN roads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO16 km of reconstructed roads (km)
CO17 km of new railroads (km)
CO18 km of TEN railroads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO19 km of reconstructed railroads (km)
CO24 Additional capacity of renewable energy production (MW)
CO25 Additional population served by water projects (people)
CO26 Additional population served by waste water projects (people)
CO29 Area rehabilitated (km2)
CO35 Number of jobs created in tourism (FTE)
The indicator "CO00 Aggregated Jobs (FTE)" found in the dataset is the result of calculations made by DG REGIO to provide a corrected aggregate value for indicators CO01, CO06, CO09 and CO35. In examining the data reported it became clear that CO01 was often not a correct
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
792
This file contains enterprise related "categorisation data", showing the total programmed/reprogrammed amounts and the increases / decreases, from the ERDF/ESF programmes as adopted since 1/2/2020 mainly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The data is in current prices. It is updated daily to reflect reprogramming by the programmes.
Parameters:
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention (24) codes : 001, 002, 003, 004, 056, 057, 062, 063, 064, 065, 066, 067, 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, 104, 106.
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
Parameters:
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention (24) codes : 001, 002, 003, 004, 056, 057, 062, 063, 064, 065, 066, 067, 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, 104, 106.
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215. These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.). In this report only the health Intervention Fields are presented.
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
October 6 2021
Views
732
As part of the CRII/CRII+ package, at the request of a country, the expenditure declared in 2020-2021 accounting exercise could be financed 100% by EU resources. This option of 100% European co-financing is one of the most popular measures with the majority of modified programmes making use of this possibility.
The data below shows the number modified programmes with 100% EU co-financing in relation to the total number of cohesion policy programmes by country (TC = Interreg programmes). The table also counts the total number of priority exes (investments envelopes) and the number with 100% EU cofinancing.
Updated
October 6 2021
Views
730
Tags
A-Z
- 100% (1)
- 1988-1993 (3)
- 1994-1999 (3)
- 2000-2006 (3)
- 2007-2013 (149)
- 2010 (1)
- 2014-2020 (125)
- 2014-2020 allocations (35)
- 2019 (2)
- 2020 (1)
- 2021-2027 (3)
- 2021-2027 initial allocations (1)
- 2040 vision (1)
- absorption (6)
- achievements (9)
- administration (1)
- agriculture (1)
- air (1)
- air quality (34)
- airport (1)
- allocations 2021-2027 (1)
- ambulances (1)
- annual (4)
- annual pre-financing (3)
- area (1)
- article 7 (1)
- awareness (1)
- axis (1)
- benchmarking (2)
- beneficiaries (1)
- beyond gdp (3)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity tracking (1)
- blog (2)
- broadband (33)
- business development (32)
- capacity building (1)
- carbon footprint (1)
- categories of region (1)
- categorisation (29)
- categorisation data (1)
- categorisation system (1)
- category of region (88)
- cci (3)
- cf (125)
- chronology (1)
- circular economy (1)
- cities (1)
- citizens’ perception (2)
- clean transport (3)
- clean urban transport (2)
- climate action (1)
- climate adaptation (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate tracking (2)
- clld (1)
- closure (1)
- co-financing (1)
- co2 (1)
- cohesion (4)
- cohesion fund (52)
- cohesion policy (172)
- cohesionfund (1)
- commitment plan (1)
- common indicators (20)
- common output (1)
- common result (1)
- communciation (9)
- competitiveness (3)
- core (3)
- core indicators (134)
- coronavirus (4)
- coronavirus response (2)
- costs (3)
- counterfactual (2)
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations (1)
- coverage (1)
- covid (9)
- covid vaccine (1)
- covid-19 (13)
- covid19 (6)
- crii (8)
- crii+ (2)
- cross-cutting_themes (1)
- culture (10)
- cycle paths (1)
- cycling (1)
- data story (1)
- datastory (1)
- decided (4)
- decided finances (1)
- declarations (1)
- decommitment (3)
- deprived communities (2)
- detailed themes (1)
- development chronology (1)
- dg regional and urban policy (133)
- dimensions (1)
- disaster support (1)
- disasters (1)
- drinking water (1)
- drought (2)
- e-business (1)
- e-health (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-tourism (1)
- eafrd (101)
- eaggf (5)
- earthquakes (2)
- econometric (1)
- econometric modelling (1)
- economic activity (1)
- economic sector (1)
- economic sectors (1)
- edrf (1)
- education infrastructure (33)
- efficiency (3)
- emergency services (2)
- emff (94)
- energy (35)
- energy efficiency (1)
- energy union (1)
- eni (7)
- enterprise (1)
- enterprise support (2)
- enterprises (1)
- environment (34)
- eonomometric (4)
- equity (2)
- erdf (139)
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020 (6)
- esf (135)
- esf participants (1)
- esf participation (34)
- esf+ (1)
- esf+ secondary theme (1)
- esi funds (89)
- esif (19)
- esif odp (1)
- eu (4)
- eu allocations (1)
- eu budget (1)
- eu countries (6)
- eu funding per capita (2)
- eu payment (6)
- eu payments (4)
- eu regional policy (3)
- eu solidarity fund (1)
- eu-spi (2)
- eurobarometer (1)
- eurobarometer, awareness, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, perception, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, priorities, eu, regional, policy (1)
- european regional competitiveness index (2)
- eusf (2)
- euspi (1)
- evaluation (13)
- evaluations (1)
- expenditure (10)
- fead (7)
- finances implemented (5)
- financial instruments (3)
- financial plans (1)
- fire (10)
- fire prevention (1)
- fires (1)
- firms (3)
- flood prevention (1)
- floods (11)
- flying flags (2)
- foot paths (1)
- forest fires (1)
- form of finance (21)
- form of support (1)
- forthcoming (1)
- framework (1)
- fund (90)
- fund of funds (2)
- funds (3)
- future developments (1)
- gdp (1)
- gender tracking (1)
- geographic characteristics (1)
- ghg (1)
- green (1)
- green deal (3)
- green tracking (1)
- gross fixed capital formation (1)
- guarantee funds (1)
- guarantees (1)
- health (7)
- health emergencies (1)
- health infrastructure (33)
- healthcare (4)
- heritage (1)
- historic data (4)
- historic payments (6)
- hospitals (2)
- how to (1)
- icu beds (1)
- ijg (1)
- impact (1)
- implementation evaluations (1)
- implemented (9)
- in profile (1)
- index (5)
- indicator (2)
- indicators (9)
- indice (1)
- inequality (2)
- infrastructure (2)
- initial allocation (1)
- initial pre-financing (2)
- inland waterways (1)
- innovation (35)
- integrated (1)
- inter modal (2)
- interim payments (3)
- interreg (2)
- intervention field (18)
- intervention fields (6)
- intervention_fields (1)
- investment progress (4)
- investments (1)
- ip (2)
- ipae (7)
- island (1)
- iti (1)
- jtf (1)
- labour market (32)
- large enterprises (1)
- loan (1)
- loan funds (1)
- loans (1)
- location (1)
- lookup (1)
- low carbon (2)
- low carbon transport (1)
- macro region (1)
- macro-regional and sea basin strategies (1)
- major projects (4)
- maritime safety (1)
- measure level (1)
- medecines (2)
- member state (2)
- member states (1)
- migration (1)
- modelling (5)
- monitoring (1)
- mountain (1)
- mp (4)
- multi modal (2)
- multimodal (33)
- national parks (1)
- natura 2000 (1)
- natural areas (1)
- nature (1)
- new enterprises (1)
- nomenclature des unités territoriales (1)
- non-paper (1)
- nuts (5)
- nuts 2 (1)
- nuts 2 2016 (1)
- nuts 2010 (1)
- nuts 3 (1)
- nuts allocation (1)
- nuts codes (1)
- nuts-2 (8)
- nuts2 (5)
- nuts3 (1)
- operational programme (1)
- operations (2)
- outermost (1)
- outputs (1)
- over programming (1)
- paid (3)
- pandemic (1)
- participation (3)
- payment execution (1)
- payment timeseries (5)
- payments (1)
- peer to peer (1)
- perceptions (1)
- performance (1)
- performance framework (1)
- performance reserve (2)
- performance review (1)
- planned (13)
- planned development (1)
- pollution (1)
- port (1)
- ports (33)
- ppe (1)
- pre-financing (1)
- priority axis (87)
- priority theme (2)
- programme (90)
- programmes (2)
- progress (1)
- project selection (1)
- projects (1)
- public health (2)
- public investment (2)
- r+d activities (2)
- rail (2)
- railway (34)
- rates (2)
- raw data (1)
- rci (5)
- react-eu (3)
- recoveries (3)
- recycling (1)
- region (1)
- regional competitiveness (2)
- regional competitiveness index 2019 (2)
- regional coverage (1)
- regional policy (6)
- regionalised (5)
- regions (1)
- regression (2)
- renewables (1)
- reprogramming (2)
- reprogrammming (1)
- research (36)
- research institutes (1)
- reserve (1)
- resources (1)
- review (1)
- risk prevention (10)
- road (34)
- rtd (1)
- rtd activities (2)
- rtd infrastructure (2)
- rtdi (33)
- rup (1)
- rural (2)
- rural development (1)
- sanitation (1)
- scatterplot (1)
- science parks (2)
- scores (1)
- sdg 6 (1)
- sectoral data (1)
- sectors (2)
- selected (13)
- selected operations (1)
- selection rate (1)
- singaling (1)
- small enterprises (1)
- smart grids (1)
- smart growth (2)
- sme (1)
- sme financing (1)
- smes (38)
- social (1)
- social inclusion (32)
- social progress (1)
- social progress index (2)
- solidarity (2)
- sparsely populated (1)
- specific funds (2)
- specific objective (1)
- spending category (35)
- spi (4)
- start-ups (1)
- storms (2)
- story (2)
- story guide (1)
- strategies (1)
- structural funds (1)
- studies (1)
- success (2)
- sump (1)
- sustainable (3)
- sustainable urban development (1)
- ta (1)
- taiex (1)
- targets (3)
- technical assistance (33)
- technology (1)
- technology institutes (2)
- ten-t (1)
- territorial delivery mechanism (20)
- territorial development (1)
- territorial dimension (20)
- territorial focus (1)
- territory (2)
- territory types (1)
- thematic allocations (1)
- thematic data (1)
- thematic objective (88)
- thematic objectives (1)
- thematic objectives erdf esf cf 2014-2020 (13)
- theme (2)
- themes (1)
- theory based (1)
- theory based evaluation (1)
- time (1)
- time series (1)
- totaluncashedrecoveryamountfromyear (1)
- tourism (10)
- tourist attractions (1)
- track (1)
- transnational (1)
- transport (34)
- uban transport (1)
- universities (2)
- urban (2)
- urban development (1)
- urban mobility (1)
- urban transport (34)
- user guide (1)
- user survey (1)
- user surveysts (1)
- uwwtd (1)
- vaccination (1)
- vaccine (2)
- vaccines (1)
- variation (1)
- vcf (2)
- ventilators (1)
- venture capital (1)
- waste treatment (1)
- waste water (1)
- waste water treatment (33)
- water (1)
- water conservation (1)
- water framework (1)
- water supply (1)
- wellbeing (1)
- working capital (1)
- year (1)
- yei (97)
- yei participants (1)
- z scores (1)