71 Results
filtered by...
Filter
View Types > Datasets
Sort
Sort by Alphabetical
Filter
71 Results
filtered by
View Types > Datasets
Clear All
This dataset provides the raw cumulative categorisation data on the projects selected for support as reported in the 322 ERDF/CF programme final implementation reports (FIR) as presented in the closure documeantation. The dataset is the best approximation of thematic content of what was financed during 2007-2013.
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
This raw data is of interest because it allows cross analysis of the different dimensions to answer questions such as:
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
A version of this data as at the end of 2014 was previously published here: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-Categorisation-Projectselection-/b5xq-38ds
The planned categorisation amounts under certain dimension were also published in dataset for end-2008 and end-2015 : https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/SF-2007-2013-Categorisation-Planned-2008-and-2015/x2d8-jjj2
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
828
This is a historic dataset on EU budget amounts requested by Member States in their declarations of expenditure for the 2007-2013 EAFRD programming period. It provides the data per Declaration year, Quarter, Axis and Measure.
This is the final version of the dataset, considering that all the programmes for the 2007-2013 programming period are now closed.
This brochure provides a description of 2007-2013 EAFRD programmes : https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/15e0ed5e-16d6-4766-8005-53c51522e779
Updated
July 6 2020
Views
286
The data available provides **national values** for outputs under 18 core indicators reported by over 300 ERDF/CF programmes across the EU.
[The disaggregated programme achievements values for the 4 years 2012-2015 are provided in a separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-achievements-core-indicators-by-/dsvh-4gnx ]
[The disaggregated programme achievements values for the 4 years 2012-2015 are provided in a separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-achievements-core-indicators-by-/dsvh-4gnx ]
Last data update: March 2018.
The values reported relate to achievements tracked in monitoring systems as reported by projects financed with EU investments in the period 2007-2015.
For three Member States - Croatia, Romania and Slokavia - the final values may include outputs from 2016 under specific extensions provided; in those cases the final values are nonetheless tagged as "2015" in order to allow aggregation.
The values reported relate to achievements tracked in monitoring systems as reported by projects financed with EU investments in the period 2007-2015.
For three Member States - Croatia, Romania and Slokavia - the final values may include outputs from 2016 under specific extensions provided; in those cases the final values are nonetheless tagged as "2015" in order to allow aggregation.
1. BACKGROUND:
After the negotiations on the ERDF and Cohesion Fund operational programmes (OPs) for 2007-2013, the Commission recommended the use of 'core indicators' for the main intervention areas. Core indicators can be used to compare and aggregate data across similar priorities or measures. Reporting on core indicators was not a legal obligation in 2007-2013. As a pilot, voluntary exercise it allowed the Member States (MS) and the Commission to establish reporting routines and detecting practical reporting issues. The effort undertaken to report against core indicators has improved accountability in the use of the Funds. Strategic reports were submitted by the MS twice in the course of the programming period (in 2009 and 2012), including core indicator data to communicate progress towards achieving policy objectives. Thanks to the use of core indicators, this was the first programme period in which indicator data could be aggregated and analysed across programmes.
After the negotiations on the ERDF and Cohesion Fund operational programmes (OPs) for 2007-2013, the Commission recommended the use of 'core indicators' for the main intervention areas. Core indicators can be used to compare and aggregate data across similar priorities or measures. Reporting on core indicators was not a legal obligation in 2007-2013. As a pilot, voluntary exercise it allowed the Member States (MS) and the Commission to establish reporting routines and detecting practical reporting issues. The effort undertaken to report against core indicators has improved accountability in the use of the Funds. Strategic reports were submitted by the MS twice in the course of the programming period (in 2009 and 2012), including core indicator data to communicate progress towards achieving policy objectives. Thanks to the use of core indicators, this was the first programme period in which indicator data could be aggregated and analysed across programmes.
2. USING THE DATA:
The data is provided by Member State in annual cumulative time series 2009-2015 where values were reported. Annual value can be compared but **SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED** as they are already cumulative.
The dataset also includes annual aggregate values at EU level. If aggregating values from the dataset **DO NOT AGGREGATE THE EU TOTALS AND NATIONAL VALUES** in order to avoid double counting.
The data is provided by Member State in annual cumulative time series 2009-2015 where values were reported. Annual value can be compared but **SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED** as they are already cumulative.
The dataset also includes annual aggregate values at EU level. If aggregating values from the dataset **DO NOT AGGREGATE THE EU TOTALS AND NATIONAL VALUES** in order to avoid double counting.
3. SCOPE OF THE DATA:
As part of the ex-post evaluation the reported indicators values for 2012 and 2013 available were examined in 2014-2015 by independent consultants. The synthesis report of their work (March 2015) is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#1
The values for 2014 and 2015 were established by DG REGIO by comparing the values reported by the programme authorities for those years with the work of the consultant on the values reported for 2012 and 2013 and compiling a picture of the progress. The 2015 data is derived from the final report programme reports received in March 2017.
The following is the list of "core indicators" that were examined and can be found in the dataset when used and reported by the programmes:
CO04 Number of RTD projects (N° projects)
CO05 Number of cooperation project enterprises-research institutions (N° projects)
CO06 Research jobs created (FTE)
CO07 Number of direct investment aid projects to SME (Number)
CO08 Number of start-ups supported (Enterprises)
CO09 Jobs created in SME (gross, full time equivalent) (FTE)
CO12 Additional population covered by broadband access (people)
CO14 km of new roads (km)
CO15 km of TEN roads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO16 km of reconstructed roads (km)
CO17 km of new railroads (km)
CO18 km of TEN railroads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO19 km of reconstructed railroads (km)
CO24 Additional capacity of renewable energy production (MW)
CO25 Additional population served by water projects (people)
CO26 Additional population served by waste water projects (people)
CO29 Area rehabilitated (km2)
CO35 Number of jobs created in tourism (FTE)
CO04 Number of RTD projects (N° projects)
CO05 Number of cooperation project enterprises-research institutions (N° projects)
CO06 Research jobs created (FTE)
CO07 Number of direct investment aid projects to SME (Number)
CO08 Number of start-ups supported (Enterprises)
CO09 Jobs created in SME (gross, full time equivalent) (FTE)
CO12 Additional population covered by broadband access (people)
CO14 km of new roads (km)
CO15 km of TEN roads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO16 km of reconstructed roads (km)
CO17 km of new railroads (km)
CO18 km of TEN railroads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO19 km of reconstructed railroads (km)
CO24 Additional capacity of renewable energy production (MW)
CO25 Additional population served by water projects (people)
CO26 Additional population served by waste water projects (people)
CO29 Area rehabilitated (km2)
CO35 Number of jobs created in tourism (FTE)
The indicator "CO00 Aggregated Jobs (FTE)" found in the dataset is the result
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
17,313
The data available provides ** VALUES BY PROGRAMME ** for outputs under 18 core indicators reported by over 300 ERDF/CF programmes across the EU.
[The aggregated country achievements values for the 4 years 2012-2015 are provided in a separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/dataset/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-achievements-core-Indicators-tot/w9mt-s8si ]
Last data update: March 2018.
[The aggregated country achievements values for the 4 years 2012-2015 are provided in a separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/dataset/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-achievements-core-Indicators-tot/w9mt-s8si ]
Last data update: March 2018.
The values reported relate to achievements tracked in monitoring systems as reported by projects financed with EU investments in the period 2007-2015.
For three Member States - Croatia, Romania and Slokavia - the final values may include projects finances also in 2016 under specific provisions; in those cases the final values are nonetheless reported as "2015" in order to allow aggregation.
For three Member States - Croatia, Romania and Slokavia - the final values may include projects finances also in 2016 under specific provisions; in those cases the final values are nonetheless reported as "2015" in order to allow aggregation.
1. BACKGROUND:
After the negotiations on the ERDF and Cohesion Fund operational programmes (OPs) for 2007-2013, the Commission recommended the use of 'core indicators' for the main intervention areas. Core indicators can be used to compare and aggregate data across similar priorities or measures. Reporting on core indicators was not a legal obligation in 2007-2013. As a pilot, voluntary exercise it allowed the Member States (MS) and the Commission to establish reporting routines and detecting practical reporting issues. The effort undertaken to report against core indicators has improved accountability in the use of the Funds. Strategic reports were submitted by the MS twice in the course of the programming period (in 2009 and 2012), including core indicator data to communicate progress towards achieving policy objectives. Thanks to the use of core indicators, this was the first programme period in which indicator data could be aggregated and analysed across programmes.
After the negotiations on the ERDF and Cohesion Fund operational programmes (OPs) for 2007-2013, the Commission recommended the use of 'core indicators' for the main intervention areas. Core indicators can be used to compare and aggregate data across similar priorities or measures. Reporting on core indicators was not a legal obligation in 2007-2013. As a pilot, voluntary exercise it allowed the Member States (MS) and the Commission to establish reporting routines and detecting practical reporting issues. The effort undertaken to report against core indicators has improved accountability in the use of the Funds. Strategic reports were submitted by the MS twice in the course of the programming period (in 2009 and 2012), including core indicator data to communicate progress towards achieving policy objectives. Thanks to the use of core indicators, this was the first programme period in which indicator data could be aggregated and analysed across programmes.
2. USING THE DATA:
The data is provided by programme in annual cumulative time series 2012-2015 where values were reported. Annual value can be compare but **SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED** as they are already cumulative.
The data is provided by programme in annual cumulative time series 2012-2015 where values were reported. Annual value can be compare but **SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED** as they are already cumulative.
3. SCOPE OF THE DATA:
As part of the ex-post evaluation the reported indicators values for 2012 and 2013 available were examined in 2014-2015 by independent consultants. The synthesis report of their work (March 2015) is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#1
The values for 2014 and 2015 were established by DG REGIO by comparing the values reported by the programme authorities for those years with the work of the consultant on the values reported for 2012 and 2013 and compiling a picture of the progress. The 2015 data is derived from the final report programme reports received in March 2017.
The following is the list of "core indicators" that were examined and can be found in the dataset when used and reported by the programmes:
CO04 Number of RTD projects (N° projects)
CO05 Number of cooperation project enterprises-research institutions (N° projects)
CO06 Research jobs created (FTE)
CO07 Number of direct investment aid projects to SME (Number)
CO08 Number of start-ups supported (Enterprises)
CO09 Jobs created in SME (gross, full time equivalent) (FTE)
CO12 Additional population covered by broadband access (people)
CO14 km of new roads (km)
CO15 km of TEN roads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO16 km of reconstructed roads (km)
CO17 km of new railroads (km)
CO18 km of TEN railroads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO19 km of reconstructed railroads (km)
CO24 Additional capacity of renewable energy production (MW)
CO25 Additional population served by water projects (people)
CO26 Additional population served by waste water projects (people)
CO29 Area rehabilitated (km2)
CO35 Number of jobs created in tourism (FTE)
CO04 Number of RTD projects (N° projects)
CO05 Number of cooperation project enterprises-research institutions (N° projects)
CO06 Research jobs created (FTE)
CO07 Number of direct investment aid projects to SME (Number)
CO08 Number of start-ups supported (Enterprises)
CO09 Jobs created in SME (gross, full time equivalent) (FTE)
CO12 Additional population covered by broadband access (people)
CO14 km of new roads (km)
CO15 km of TEN roads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO16 km of reconstructed roads (km)
CO17 km of new railroads (km)
CO18 km of TEN railroads (new and reconstructed) (km)
CO19 km of reconstructed railroads (km)
CO24 Additional capacity of renewable energy production (MW)
CO25 Additional population served by water projects (people)
CO26 Additional population served by waste water projects (people)
CO29 Area rehabilitated (km2)
CO35 Number of jobs created in tourism (FTE)
The indicator "CO00 Aggregated Jobs (FTE)" found in the dataset is the result of calculations made by DG REGIO to provide a corrected aggregate value for indicators CO01, CO06, CO09 and CO35. In examining the data reported it became clear that CO01 was often not a correct
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
698
This dataset provides the raw cumulative categorisation data on the projects selected for support as reported in the 322 ERDF/CF programme annual Implementation reports (AIR) as at end 2014. The dataset is not a final picture of what was financed during 2007-2013. The values at the moment of closure of the period 2007-2013 are provided in this dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/ESIF-2007-2013-categorisation-raw-data-from-closur/qt3c-wiyg
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
This raw data is of interest because it allows cross analysis of the different dimensions to answer questions such as:
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,099
Statistics provided by the EU countries on the participation in ESF-funded projects during the ESF period 2007-2013.
The European Commission cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the data or information provided by the Member States, nor does it accept responsibility or liability for any use made thereof.
The European Commission cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the data or information provided by the Member States, nor does it accept responsibility or liability for any use made thereof.
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
8,418
Updated
September 8 2020
Views
185
Updated
September 8 2020
Views
201
The definitions set by Commission guidance - https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/2014/working/guidance_monitoring_eval_en.pdf - for the common indicators used in 2014-2020.
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
427
This dataset includes the figures by Fund (European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund, Cohesion Fund, Youth Employment Initiative) for the 2014-2020 period and summarizes the financial allocations after the implementation of the Operational Programs.
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
11,293
Tags
A-Z
- 100% (1)
- 1988-1993 (2)
- 1994-1999 (2)
- 2000-2006 (2)
- 2007-2013 (148)
- 2010 (1)
- 2014-2020 (125)
- 2014-2020 allocations (35)
- 2019 (2)
- 2020 (1)
- 2040 vision (1)
- absorption (6)
- achievements (9)
- administration (1)
- agriculture (1)
- air (1)
- air quality (31)
- airport (1)
- ambulances (1)
- annual (3)
- annual pre-financing (3)
- area (1)
- article 7 (1)
- awareness (1)
- axis (1)
- benchmarking (2)
- beneficiaries (1)
- beyond gdp (3)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity tracking (1)
- blog (1)
- broadband (30)
- business development (29)
- capacity building (1)
- carbon footprint (1)
- categorisation (25)
- categorisation data (1)
- category of region (88)
- cci (3)
- cf (123)
- chronology (1)
- circular economy (1)
- cities (1)
- citizens’ perception (2)
- clean transport (3)
- clean urban transport (1)
- climate action (1)
- climate adaptation (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate tracking (1)
- clld (1)
- closure (1)
- co-financing (1)
- co2 (1)
- cohesion (4)
- cohesion fund (51)
- cohesion policy (172)
- cohesionfund (1)
- commitment plan (1)
- common indicators (19)
- communciation (6)
- competitiveness (3)
- core (3)
- core indicators (134)
- coronavirus (3)
- coronavirus response (2)
- costs (3)
- counterfactual (2)
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations (1)
- coverage (1)
- covid (9)
- covid vaccine (1)
- covid-19 (12)
- covid19 (6)
- crii (8)
- crii+ (2)
- cross-cutting_themes (1)
- culture (7)
- cycling (1)
- data story (1)
- datastory (1)
- decided (4)
- decided finances (1)
- declarations (1)
- decommitment (3)
- deprived communities (1)
- detailed themes (1)
- development chronology (1)
- dg regional and urban policy (133)
- dimensions (1)
- disaster support (1)
- disasters (1)
- drinking water (1)
- drought (2)
- e-business (1)
- e-health (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-tourism (1)
- eafrd (100)
- eaggf (4)
- earthquakes (2)
- econometric (1)
- econometric modelling (1)
- economic sector (1)
- economic sectors (1)
- edrf (1)
- education infrastructure (30)
- efficiency (3)
- emergency services (1)
- emff (94)
- energy (32)
- energy efficiency (1)
- energy union (1)
- eni (7)
- enterprise (1)
- enterprise support (2)
- enterprises (1)
- environment (31)
- eonomometric (3)
- equity (3)
- erdf (134)
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020 (6)
- esf (131)
- esf participation (34)
- esi funds (89)
- esif (19)
- esif odp (1)
- eu (4)
- eu allocations (1)
- eu countries (6)
- eu funding per capita (2)
- eu payment (6)
- eu payments (4)
- eu regional policy (3)
- eu solidarity fund (1)
- eu-spi (2)
- eurobarometer (1)
- eurobarometer, awareness, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, perception, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, priorities, eu, regional, policy (1)
- european regional competitiveness index (2)
- eusf (2)
- euspi (1)
- evaluation (10)
- evaluations (1)
- expenditure (10)
- fead (7)
- finances implemented (4)
- financial instruments (4)
- financial plans (1)
- fire (7)
- fire prevention (1)
- fires (1)
- firms (3)
- flood prevention (1)
- floods (8)
- flying flags (2)
- forest fires (1)
- form of finance (18)
- forthcoming (1)
- framework (1)
- fund (90)
- fund of funds (3)
- funds (4)
- future developments (1)
- gdp (1)
- geographic characteristics (1)
- ghg (1)
- green (1)
- green deal (3)
- gross fixed capital formation (1)
- guarantee funds (1)
- guarantees (2)
- health (6)
- health emergencies (1)
- health infrastructure (30)
- healthcare (4)
- heritage (1)
- historic data (3)
- historic payments (5)
- hospitals (1)
- how to (1)
- icu beds (1)
- impact (1)
- implementation evaluations (1)
- implemented (9)
- in profile (1)
- index (5)
- indicator (2)
- indicators (8)
- indice (1)
- inequality (1)
- infrastructure (2)
- initial pre-financing (2)
- inland waterways (1)
- innovation (32)
- integrated (1)
- inter modal (2)
- interim payments (3)
- interreg (2)
- intervention field (15)
- intervention fields (5)
- intervention_fields (1)
- investment progress (3)
- investments (1)
- ip (2)
- ipae (7)
- island (1)
- iti (1)
- labour market (29)
- large enterprises (1)
- loan (1)
- loan funds (1)
- loans (2)
- location (1)
- lookup (1)
- low carbon (2)
- low carbon transport (1)
- macro region (1)
- major projects (4)
- maritime safety (1)
- measure level (1)
- medecines (1)
- member state (2)
- member states (1)
- migration (1)
- modelling (4)
- monitoring (1)
- mountain (1)
- mp (4)
- multi modal (2)
- multimodal (30)
- national parks (1)
- natura 2000 (1)
- natural areas (1)
- nature (1)
- new enterprises (1)
- nomenclature des unités territoriales (1)
- non-paper (1)
- nuts (4)
- nuts 2010 (1)
- nuts codes (1)
- nuts-2 (7)
- nuts2 (4)
- nuts3 (1)
- operational programme (1)
- operations (2)
- outermost (1)
- outputs (1)
- over programming (1)
- paid (3)
- pandemic (1)
- participation (3)
- payment execution (1)
- payment timeseries (4)
- payments (1)
- peer to peer (1)
- perceptions (1)
- performance (1)
- performance framework (1)
- performance reserve (2)
- performance review (1)
- planned (13)
- planned development (1)
- pollution (1)
- port (1)
- ports (30)
- ppe (1)
- pre-financing (1)
- priority axis (87)
- priority theme (2)
- programme (90)
- programmes (2)
- progress (1)
- project selection (1)
- projects (1)
- public health (1)
- public investment (2)
- r+d activities (2)
- rail (2)
- railway (31)
- rates (2)
- raw data (1)
- rci (4)
- recoveries (3)
- recycling (1)
- region (1)
- regional competitiveness (2)
- regional competitiveness index 2019 (2)
- regional coverage (1)
- regional policy (6)
- regionalised (4)
- regions (1)
- regression (1)
- renewables (1)
- reprogramming (2)
- reprogrammming (1)
- research (33)
- research institutes (1)
- reserve (1)
- resources (1)
- review (1)
- risk prevention (7)
- road (31)
- rtd (1)
- rtd activities (2)
- rtd infrastructure (2)
- rtdi (30)
- rup (1)
- rural (2)
- rural development (1)
- sanitation (1)
- scatterplot (1)
- science parks (2)
- scores (1)
- sdg 6 (1)
- sectoral data (1)
- sectors (2)
- selected (13)
- selected operations (1)
- selection rate (1)
- singaling (1)
- small enterprises (1)
- smart grids (1)
- smart growth (2)
- sme (1)
- sme financing (1)
- smes (35)
- social (1)
- social inclusion (29)
- social progress (1)
- social progress index (2)
- solidarity (2)
- sparsely populated (1)
- specific funds (2)
- specific objective (1)
- spending category (35)
- spi (4)
- start-ups (1)
- storms (2)
- story (2)
- story guide (1)
- strategies (1)
- structural funds (1)
- studies (1)
- success (2)
- sump (1)
- sustainable (3)
- ta (1)
- taiex (1)
- targets (3)
- technical assistance (30)
- technology (1)
- technology institutes (2)
- ten-t (1)
- territorial delivery mechanism (16)
- territorial development (1)
- territorial dimension (16)
- territory (2)
- territory types (1)
- thematic allocations (1)
- thematic data (1)
- thematic objective (88)
- thematic objectives (1)
- thematic objectives erdf esf cf 2014-2020 (13)
- theme (2)
- themes (1)
- theory based (1)
- theory based evaluation (1)
- time (1)
- time series (1)
- totaluncashedrecoveryamountfromyear (1)
- tourism (7)
- tourist attractions (1)
- track (1)
- transnational (1)
- transport (31)
- uban transport (1)
- universities (2)
- urban (2)
- urban development (1)
- urban mobility (1)
- urban transport (31)
- user guide (1)
- user survey (1)
- user surveysts (1)
- uwwtd (1)
- vaccination (1)
- vaccine (1)
- vaccines (1)
- variation (1)
- vcf (3)
- ventilators (1)
- venture capital (1)
- waste treatment (1)
- waste water (1)
- waste water treatment (30)
- water (1)
- water conservation (1)
- water framework (1)
- water supply (1)
- wellbeing (1)
- working capital (1)
- year (1)
- yei (97)
- z scores (1)