71 Results
filtered by...
Filter
View Types > Datasets
Sort
Sort by Alphabetical
Filter
71 Results
filtered by
View Types > Datasets
Clear All
As part of the CRII/CRII+ package, at the request of a country, the expenditure declared in 2020-2021 accounting exercise could be financed 100% by EU resources. This option of 100% European co-financing is one of the most popular measures with the majority of modified programmes making use of this possibility.
The data below shows the number modified programmes with 100% EU co-financing in relation to the total number of cohesion policy programmes by country (TC = Interreg programmes). The table also counts the total number of priority exes (investments envelopes) and the number with 100% EU cofinancing.
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
412
** NEW 2/2021**: new COVID indicators were added linked to support to the vaccination effort.
**NEW 11/2020**: New reserved CV indicator are added to retain the possibility to extend the list.
During 2020, many countries and regions will amend their ERDF and ESF programmes to transfer funds to actions targeting the COVID-19 response. Several programmes have discussed with the Commission their plans to add programmes specific indicators for new actions targeting the COVID-19 response to capture the outputs from expenditure.
In order to exploit programme specific indicators, which could be commonly applied across Member States, the Commission services proposed a voluntary list of such indicators to the Member States on 12 May, to be used when relevant. The use of the unique codes and names will allow the Commission to make use of the monitoring done by the cooperating programmes. A wide use of these codes and indicators would be highly valued for accountability, transparency and communication at the National and EU levels. It the programmes take up these specific indicators the targets will become available later in 2020 with the first annual report on implementation due in May 2021.
In order to exploit programme specific indicators, which could be commonly applied across Member States, the Commission services proposed a voluntary list of such indicators to the Member States on 12 May, to be used when relevant. The use of the unique codes and names will allow the Commission to make use of the monitoring done by the cooperating programmes. A wide use of these codes and indicators would be highly valued for accountability, transparency and communication at the National and EU levels. It the programmes take up these specific indicators the targets will become available later in 2020 with the first annual report on implementation due in May 2021.
NOTE:
1. On 10 July the file was modified to better reflect the possible uses of the ESF indicators as outputs or result indicators (separate columns added for both types).
1. On 10 July the file was modified to better reflect the possible uses of the ESF indicators as outputs or result indicators (separate columns added for both types).
Updated
February 4 2021
Views
3,125
This file contains enterprise related "categorisation data", showing the total programmed/reprogrammed amounts and the increases / decreases, from the ERDF/ESF programmes as adopted since 1/2/2020 mainly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The data is in current prices. It is updated daily to reflect reprogramming by the programmes.
Parameters:
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention (24) codes : 001, 002, 003, 004, 056, 057, 062, 063, 064, 065, 066, 067, 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, 104, 106.
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
Parameters:
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention (24) codes : 001, 002, 003, 004, 056, 057, 062, 063, 064, 065, 066, 067, 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 073, 074, 075, 076, 077, 104, 106.
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215. These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.). In this report only the health Intervention Fields are presented.
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
424
This report provides an overview and details of the latest version adopted by EC or MS of the Operational Programmes (OP) in SFC2014 Front Office. It also displays the increase/ decrease of the EU Amount between two dates.
Parameters:
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention codes : 053, 081, 107 and 112
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
- Funds : ERDF and ESF
- Categories of intervention codes : 053, 081, 107 and 112
- Lower limit date: 31/01/2020
- Upper limit date: current date
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
483
Under the CRIII+ proposals, at the request of a country, the resources available for programming for the year 2020, could be transferred between the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund.
The dataset below show the increase and decreases in EU funding by country, programme fund and category of region since the adoption of the CRII package. As no new EU funds were available the sum of changes overall is normally "zero" (increases = decreases).
The dataset below show the increase and decreases in EU funding by country, programme fund and category of region since the adoption of the CRII package. As no new EU funds were available the sum of changes overall is normally "zero" (increases = decreases).
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
369
The report compares immediate and longer-term direct results with outputs achieved in the ESF programmes. For example, the number of ‘participants in employment’ is divided by the number of unemployed plus the number of inactive participants. The resulting percentage tells the share of participants who obtained a particular type of result, measured by a common indicator. The types of results are
• job-search (CR01,compared to the number of inactive participants),
• being in education or training (CR02, compared to the total of participants),
• gaining a qualification (CR03, compared to the total of participants),
• in employment (CR04, compared to unemployed+inactive) and
• a combination of all the above positive outcomes (CR01+CR02+CR03+CR04, compared to the total of participants), moreover,
• in employment 6 months after leaving (CR06, compared to unemployed+inactive),
• improved labour market situation 6 months after leaving (CR07, compared to employed) and finally
• participants above 54 years of age in employment 6 months after leaving (CR08, compared to unemployed+inactive).
The output, the number of participants includes persons who were still receiving support at the time of reporting and persons who dropped out of the operations before completion. If the comparison with the results was made only by taking into account the participants who complete the operation, the success rates would be higher. (The number of participants who complete the operation is not reported though.)
The report provides the success rates for all ESF operational programmes (CCIs) and priority axes at the level of the investment priority, broken down by category of region. Data on ESF common result indicators are taken from Tables 2A and 2B; data on ESF common output indicators are taken from Table 4A of the annual implementation reports.
• job-search (CR01,compared to the number of inactive participants),
• being in education or training (CR02, compared to the total of participants),
• gaining a qualification (CR03, compared to the total of participants),
• in employment (CR04, compared to unemployed+inactive) and
• a combination of all the above positive outcomes (CR01+CR02+CR03+CR04, compared to the total of participants), moreover,
• in employment 6 months after leaving (CR06, compared to unemployed+inactive),
• improved labour market situation 6 months after leaving (CR07, compared to employed) and finally
• participants above 54 years of age in employment 6 months after leaving (CR08, compared to unemployed+inactive).
The output, the number of participants includes persons who were still receiving support at the time of reporting and persons who dropped out of the operations before completion. If the comparison with the results was made only by taking into account the participants who complete the operation, the success rates would be higher. (The number of participants who complete the operation is not reported though.)
The report provides the success rates for all ESF operational programmes (CCIs) and priority axes at the level of the investment priority, broken down by category of region. Data on ESF common result indicators are taken from Tables 2A and 2B; data on ESF common output indicators are taken from Table 4A of the annual implementation reports.
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
157
The report compares immediate and longer-term direct results with outputs achieved in the YEI programmes. For example, the number of ‘unemployed participants who are in education/training, gain a qualification, or are in employment’’ is divided by the number of unemployed participants. The resulting percentage tells the share of participants who obtained a particular type of result, measured by a common indicator.
The report provides the success rates for all ESF operational programmes (CCIs) and priority axes at the level of the investment priority, broken down by category of region. Data on ESF common result indicators are taken from Tables 2A and 2B; data on ESF common output indicators are taken from Table 4A of the annual implementation reports.
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
118
2007 - 2013 EU payments by country, operational programme, fund, objective, showing the initially planned EU amount, de-commitments, payments and recoveries by type. The dataset includes transactions for ERDF and CF programmes.
For more information on the legal basis for, see:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006R1083&from=EN
For more information on the legal basis for, see:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006R1083&from=EN
Updated
April 23 2021
Views
2,922
This dataset provides information on expected achievements (targets) set for selected common indicators defined for the each of the specific ESI funds and the decided (forecasts from selected projects) and implemented values.
The reference date for the annual reporting of progress by the programmes achievements is the end of each calendar year.
This dataset contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
This dataset contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
For more information on the common indicator definitions used by each fund please go to the "Related Information" sections at the bottom of the fund specific pages.
The same data on the **programme specific indicators** (including output and result indicators) is available in this separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2014-2020-Indicators/ESIF-2014-2020-Achievement-Details-ERDF-CF-Program/3de9-gnka
Updated
April 21 2021
Views
25,447
The categorisation system for Cohesion Policy Funds 2014-2020 (ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund) foresees 123 Intervention Field codes for the actions or activities financed by the three Funds. The planned allocation to those codes provide detailed thematic / sectoral information on the planned investments by theme.
The planned financial allocations are to be found in this dataset https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/dataset/ESIF-2014-2020-categorisation-ERDF-ESF-CF/9fpg-67a4
This lookup dataset maps the 123 intervention field codes to higher level "cross cutting" themes such as "climate change", "innovation" "enterprise support" and others combinations. It provides the Commission"s recommend list of codes to be used when assessing the financial allocations to these cross cutting themes.
The dataset also identifies the codes that are taken into account for the tracking of Climate change action along with the weightings applied.
The dataset also identifies the codes that are taken into account for the tracking of Climate change action along with the weightings applied.
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
1,100
Tags
A-Z
- 100% (1)
- 1988-1993 (2)
- 1994-1999 (2)
- 2000-2006 (2)
- 2007-2013 (148)
- 2010 (1)
- 2014-2020 (125)
- 2014-2020 allocations (35)
- 2019 (2)
- 2020 (1)
- 2040 vision (1)
- absorption (6)
- achievements (9)
- administration (1)
- agriculture (1)
- air (1)
- air quality (31)
- airport (1)
- ambulances (1)
- annual (3)
- annual pre-financing (3)
- area (1)
- article 7 (1)
- awareness (1)
- axis (1)
- benchmarking (2)
- beneficiaries (1)
- beyond gdp (3)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity tracking (1)
- blog (1)
- broadband (30)
- business development (29)
- capacity building (1)
- carbon footprint (1)
- categorisation (25)
- categorisation data (1)
- category of region (88)
- cci (3)
- cf (123)
- chronology (1)
- circular economy (1)
- cities (1)
- citizens’ perception (2)
- clean transport (3)
- clean urban transport (1)
- climate action (1)
- climate adaptation (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate tracking (1)
- clld (1)
- closure (1)
- co-financing (1)
- co2 (1)
- cohesion (4)
- cohesion fund (51)
- cohesion policy (172)
- cohesionfund (1)
- commitment plan (1)
- common indicators (19)
- communciation (6)
- competitiveness (3)
- core (3)
- core indicators (134)
- coronavirus (3)
- coronavirus response (2)
- costs (3)
- counterfactual (2)
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations (1)
- coverage (1)
- covid (9)
- covid vaccine (1)
- covid-19 (12)
- covid19 (6)
- crii (8)
- crii+ (2)
- cross-cutting_themes (1)
- culture (7)
- cycling (1)
- data story (1)
- datastory (1)
- decided (4)
- decided finances (1)
- declarations (1)
- decommitment (3)
- deprived communities (1)
- detailed themes (1)
- development chronology (1)
- dg regional and urban policy (133)
- dimensions (1)
- disaster support (1)
- disasters (1)
- drinking water (1)
- drought (2)
- e-business (1)
- e-health (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-tourism (1)
- eafrd (100)
- eaggf (4)
- earthquakes (2)
- econometric (1)
- econometric modelling (1)
- economic sector (1)
- economic sectors (1)
- edrf (1)
- education infrastructure (30)
- efficiency (3)
- emergency services (1)
- emff (94)
- energy (32)
- energy efficiency (1)
- energy union (1)
- eni (7)
- enterprise (1)
- enterprise support (2)
- enterprises (1)
- environment (31)
- eonomometric (3)
- equity (3)
- erdf (134)
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020 (6)
- esf (131)
- esf participation (34)
- esi funds (89)
- esif (19)
- esif odp (1)
- eu (4)
- eu allocations (1)
- eu countries (6)
- eu funding per capita (2)
- eu payment (6)
- eu payments (4)
- eu regional policy (3)
- eu solidarity fund (1)
- eu-spi (2)
- eurobarometer (1)
- eurobarometer, awareness, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, perception, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, priorities, eu, regional, policy (1)
- european regional competitiveness index (2)
- eusf (2)
- euspi (1)
- evaluation (10)
- evaluations (1)
- expenditure (10)
- fead (7)
- finances implemented (4)
- financial instruments (4)
- financial plans (1)
- fire (7)
- fire prevention (1)
- fires (1)
- firms (3)
- flood prevention (1)
- floods (8)
- flying flags (2)
- forest fires (1)
- form of finance (18)
- forthcoming (1)
- framework (1)
- fund (90)
- fund of funds (3)
- funds (4)
- future developments (1)
- gdp (1)
- geographic characteristics (1)
- ghg (1)
- green (1)
- green deal (3)
- gross fixed capital formation (1)
- guarantee funds (1)
- guarantees (2)
- health (6)
- health emergencies (1)
- health infrastructure (30)
- healthcare (4)
- heritage (1)
- historic data (3)
- historic payments (5)
- hospitals (1)
- how to (1)
- icu beds (1)
- impact (1)
- implementation evaluations (1)
- implemented (9)
- in profile (1)
- index (5)
- indicator (2)
- indicators (8)
- indice (1)
- inequality (1)
- infrastructure (2)
- initial pre-financing (2)
- inland waterways (1)
- innovation (32)
- integrated (1)
- inter modal (2)
- interim payments (3)
- interreg (2)
- intervention field (15)
- intervention fields (5)
- intervention_fields (1)
- investment progress (3)
- investments (1)
- ip (2)
- ipae (7)
- island (1)
- iti (1)
- labour market (29)
- large enterprises (1)
- loan (1)
- loan funds (1)
- loans (2)
- location (1)
- lookup (1)
- low carbon (2)
- low carbon transport (1)
- macro region (1)
- major projects (4)
- maritime safety (1)
- measure level (1)
- medecines (1)
- member state (2)
- member states (1)
- migration (1)
- modelling (4)
- monitoring (1)
- mountain (1)
- mp (4)
- multi modal (2)
- multimodal (30)
- national parks (1)
- natura 2000 (1)
- natural areas (1)
- nature (1)
- new enterprises (1)
- nomenclature des unités territoriales (1)
- non-paper (1)
- nuts (4)
- nuts 2010 (1)
- nuts codes (1)
- nuts-2 (7)
- nuts2 (4)
- nuts3 (1)
- operational programme (1)
- operations (2)
- outermost (1)
- outputs (1)
- over programming (1)
- paid (3)
- pandemic (1)
- participation (3)
- payment execution (1)
- payment timeseries (4)
- payments (1)
- peer to peer (1)
- perceptions (1)
- performance (1)
- performance framework (1)
- performance reserve (2)
- performance review (1)
- planned (13)
- planned development (1)
- pollution (1)
- port (1)
- ports (30)
- ppe (1)
- pre-financing (1)
- priority axis (87)
- priority theme (2)
- programme (90)
- programmes (2)
- progress (1)
- project selection (1)
- projects (1)
- public health (1)
- public investment (2)
- r+d activities (2)
- rail (2)
- railway (31)
- rates (2)
- raw data (1)
- rci (4)
- recoveries (3)
- recycling (1)
- region (1)
- regional competitiveness (2)
- regional competitiveness index 2019 (2)
- regional coverage (1)
- regional policy (6)
- regionalised (4)
- regions (1)
- regression (1)
- renewables (1)
- reprogramming (2)
- reprogrammming (1)
- research (33)
- research institutes (1)
- reserve (1)
- resources (1)
- review (1)
- risk prevention (7)
- road (31)
- rtd (1)
- rtd activities (2)
- rtd infrastructure (2)
- rtdi (30)
- rup (1)
- rural (2)
- rural development (1)
- sanitation (1)
- scatterplot (1)
- science parks (2)
- scores (1)
- sdg 6 (1)
- sectoral data (1)
- sectors (2)
- selected (13)
- selected operations (1)
- selection rate (1)
- singaling (1)
- small enterprises (1)
- smart grids (1)
- smart growth (2)
- sme (1)
- sme financing (1)
- smes (35)
- social (1)
- social inclusion (29)
- social progress (1)
- social progress index (2)
- solidarity (2)
- sparsely populated (1)
- specific funds (2)
- specific objective (1)
- spending category (35)
- spi (4)
- start-ups (1)
- storms (2)
- story (2)
- story guide (1)
- strategies (1)
- structural funds (1)
- studies (1)
- success (2)
- sump (1)
- sustainable (3)
- ta (1)
- taiex (1)
- targets (3)
- technical assistance (30)
- technology (1)
- technology institutes (2)
- ten-t (1)
- territorial delivery mechanism (16)
- territorial development (1)
- territorial dimension (16)
- territory (2)
- territory types (1)
- thematic allocations (1)
- thematic data (1)
- thematic objective (88)
- thematic objectives (1)
- thematic objectives erdf esf cf 2014-2020 (13)
- theme (2)
- themes (1)
- theory based (1)
- theory based evaluation (1)
- time (1)
- time series (1)
- totaluncashedrecoveryamountfromyear (1)
- tourism (7)
- tourist attractions (1)
- track (1)
- transnational (1)
- transport (31)
- uban transport (1)
- universities (2)
- urban (2)
- urban development (1)
- urban mobility (1)
- urban transport (31)
- user guide (1)
- user survey (1)
- user surveysts (1)
- uwwtd (1)
- vaccination (1)
- vaccine (1)
- vaccines (1)
- variation (1)
- vcf (3)
- ventilators (1)
- venture capital (1)
- waste treatment (1)
- waste water (1)
- waste water treatment (30)
- water (1)
- water conservation (1)
- water framework (1)
- water supply (1)
- wellbeing (1)
- working capital (1)
- year (1)
- yei (97)
- z scores (1)