56 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > cohesion fund
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
Categories
Tags
- cohesion fund
- 100%
- 2010
- 2020
- 2021-2027 initial allocations
- 2040 vision
- 8th cohesion report
- administration
- agriculture
- air
- airport
- allocations 2021-2027
- ambulances
- amif
- area
- article 7
- awareness
- axis
- bar chart
- biodiversity
- biodiversity tracking
- capacity building
- carbon footprint
- categorisation data
- categorisation system
- chronology
- circular economy
- cities
- climate change
- clld
- closure
- co-financing
- co2
- cohesion report
- cohesionfund
- commitment plan
- common output
- common result
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations
- coverage
- covid pandemic
- covid vaccine
- creating charts
- cross-cutting_themes
- cycle paths
- cycling
- data story
- datastory
- decided finances
- declarations
- demographic change
- detailed themes
- development chronology
- digital skills
- digital transition
- dimensions
- disaster support
- disasters
- drinking water
- e-business
- e-commerce
- e-government; digitisation
- e-health
- e-learning
- e-tourism
- econometric
- econometric modelling
- economic activity
- economic sector
- economic sectors
- edrf
- education
- election results
- emfaf
- energy efficiency
- energy union
- enterprise
- enterprises
- esf participants
- esf+
- esf+ secondary theme
- esif odp
- eu allocations
- eu budget
- eu discontent
- eu solidarity fund
- eurobarometer
- eurobarometer awareness eu regional policy
- eurobarometer perception eu regional policy
- eurobarometer priorities eu regional policy
- eurosceptisism
- eurostat
- euspi
- evaluations
- ex post evaluation
- excess deaths
- faq
- fead open data
- feedback
- financial plans
- fire prevention
- fires
- flood prevention
- foot paths
- forest fires
- form of support
- forthcoming
- framework
- frequently asked questions
- ftth
- future developments
- gender
- gender budgeting
- gender monitor
- gender targeting
- gender tracking
- geographic characteristics
- ghg emissions
- glass ceiling
- green
- green tracking
- gross fixed capital formation
- guarantee funds
- health emergencies
- heritage
- how to
- icu beds
- ijg
- impact
- implementation evaluations
- in profile
- indicators by operation
- indice
- initial allocation
- inland waterways
- integrated
- intervention_fields
- investments
- ipa
- island
- iti
- just transition
- kohesio
- large enterprises
- loan
- loan funds
- loands
- location
- lookup
- low carbon transport
- macro region
- macro-regional and sea basin strategies
- mainstreaming
- maritime safety
- measure level
- medecines
- medicine
- member states
- migration
- monitoring
- most deprived
- mountain
- national parks
- natura 2000
- natural areas
- nature
- net zero
- new enterprises
- nomenclature des unités territoriales
- nuts 2 2016
- nuts 2010
- nuts allocation
- nuts codes
- nuts3
- operational programme
- outermost
- over programming
- pa
- pandemic
- payment execution
- payments
- peer to peer
- perceptions
- performance
- performance framework
- performance review
- pie chart
- planned development
- pollution
- port
- ppe
- pre-accession
- pre-financing
- preliminary allocations
- programming outcome
- progress
- project selection
- qanda
- raw data
- recycling
- region
- regional coverage
- regional development trap
- regional gdp
- regional innovation
- regions
- renewables
- reprogrammming
- research institutes
- reserve
- resources
- results
- review
- rtd
- rup
- rural development
- sanitation
- scatterplot
- scores
- sdg 6
- sectoral data
- selected operations
- selection rate
- singaling
- skills
- small enterprises
- smart grids
- sme
- sme financing
- social
- social progress
- sparsely populated
- specific indicators
- specific objective
- start-ups
- strategies
- structural funds
- studies
- sud
- sump
- survey
- sustainable development goals
- ta
- taiex
- technology
- ten-t
- territorial development
- territorial focus
- territory types
- thematic allocations
- thematic data
- thematic objectives
- themes
- theory based
- theory based evaluation
- time
- time series
- totaluncashedrecoveryamountfromyear
- tourist attractions
- track
- transnational
- uban transport
- urban development
- urban mobility
- user feedback
- user profile
- user satisfaction
- user surveysts
- uwwtd
- vaccination
- vaccines
- variation
- ventilators
- venture capital
- visualization
- vocational skills
- waste treatment
- waste water
- water
- water conservation
- water framework
- water supply
- wellbeing
- working capital
- year
- yei participants
- z scores
- 2019
- aid intensity
- benchmarking
- blog
- carbon intensity
- citizens’ perception
- clean urban transport
- climate mitigation
- climate tracking
- counterfactual
- crii+
- deprived communities
- drought
- earthquakes
- eligibility
- emergency services
- enterprise support
- eu funding per capita
- eu-spi
- european regional competitiveness index
- eusf
- female advantage
- female disadvantage
- flying flags
- ghg
- hospitals
- indicator
- inequality
- infrastructure
- initial pre-financing
- inter modal
- interreg
- ip
- jtf
- less developped
- loans
- low carbon
- member state
- more developped
- multi modal
- non-paper
- nuts 3
- outputs
- performance reserve
- priority theme
- programmes
- projects
- public health
- public investment
- r+d activities
- rail
- rates
- regional competitiveness
- regional competitiveness index 2019
- reprogramming
- rtd activities
- rtd infrastructure
- rural
- science parks
- sdgs
- sectors
- smart growth
- social progress index
- solidarity
- specific funds
- statistics
- storms
- story
- success
- sustainable urban development
- technology institutes
- territory
- thematic concentration
- thematic investment volumes
- theme
- transition
- un
- universities
- urban
- user survey
- vaccine
- annual pre-financing
- beneficiaries
- beyond gdp
- categories of region
- cci
- clean transport
- climate action
- climate adaptation
- competitiveness
- core
- costs
- decommitment
- efficiency
- eu regional policy
- firms
- gender equality
- green deal
- guarantees
- interim payments
- nuts 2
- operations
- paid
- participation
- partnership agreement
- react-eu
- recoveries
- regression
- sustainable
- tracking
- user guide
- 1988-1993
- 1994-1999
- 2000-2006
- 2021-2027
- cohesion
- coronavirus response
- decided
- equity
- eu
- fund of funds
- healthcare
- historic data
- investment progress
- mp
- population
- spi
- targets
- vcf
- annual
- coronavirus
- eonomometric
- eu payments
- finances implemented
- financial instruments
- funds
- gdp
- major projects
- rci
- absorption
- eaggf
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020
- eu countries
- eu payment
- index
- intervention fields
- modelling
- nuts
- payment timeseries
- regional policy
- regionalised
- covid19
- eni
- fead
- health
- historic payments
- ipae
- nuts2
- achievements
- communciation
- crii
- nuts-2
- culture
- fire
- indicators
- risk prevention
- tourism
- floods
- implemented
- expenditure
- covid
- evaluation
- thematic objectives erdf esf cf 2014-2020
- planned
- selected
- covid-19
- esif
- common indicators
- intervention field
- territorial delivery mechanism
- territorial dimension
- form of finance
- categorisation
- business development
- esf participation
- labour market
- social inclusion
- 2014-2020 allocations
- education infrastructure
- health infrastructure
- multimodal
- ports
- rtdi
- spending category
- technical assistance
- waste water treatment
- air quality
- broadband
- environment
- railway
- road
- transport
- urban transport
- energy
- innovation
- research
- smes
- priority axis
- category of region
- thematic objective
- esi funds
- fund
- programme
- emff
- yei
- eafrd
- cf
- 2014-2020
- dg regional and urban policy
- core indicators
- esf
- erdf
- 2007-2013
- cohesion policy
56 Results
filtered by
Tags > cohesion fund
Clear All
This dataset provides the raw cumulative categorisation data on the projects selected for support as reported in ERDF/CF/ESF programme final implementation reports (FIR) as presented in the closure documentation. The dataset is the best approximation of thematic content of what was financed during 2007-2013.
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to selected projects along with a combination of categorisation dimension codes. The Categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
This raw data is of interest because it allows cross analysis of the different dimensions to answer questions such as:
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
- Which industries were supported under enterprise support measures? - (Comparing Priority themes vs Economic dimension)
- What sectors benefited from support to research activities
- What form of finance was used to deliver support to energy efficiency measures? - (comparing form of finance vs Priority theme)
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
A version of this data as at the end of 2014 was previously published here: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/2007-2013-ERDF-CF-Categorisation-Projectselection-/b5xq-38ds
The planned categorisation amounts under certain dimension were also published in dataset for end-2008 and end-2015 : https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/SF-2007-2013-Categorisation-Planned-2008-and-2015/x2d8-jjj2
Updated
December 5 2023
Views
2,520
This file contains categorisation data from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes and in particular it **COMPARES PLANNED AMOUNTS TO IMPLEMENTED INVESTMENTS**.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted. The implementation values are reported once a year by the 350+ programmes at end January. This dataset contains data to end-2016 and end 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted. The implementation values are reported once a year by the 350+ programmes at end January. This dataset contains data to end-2016 and end 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
The planned data is provided in tables one for each priority axis (investment pillar) of each programme. The categorisation systems is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions in total - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on 3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare. In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on 3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare. In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
Updated
September 14 2023
Views
1,071
Filtered View
1. PURPOSE: This data set provides, in a single source, regionalised (NUTS-2) annual EU expenditure data (in current prices) for specific EU funds - ERDF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD/EAGGF and ESF. This data can be used, among other purposes, to facilitate analysis on the effects of the EU funds.
In terms of the regionalisation of EU payments made, this work expands and replaces data sets previous published on the ERDF and Cohesion fund with additional years and additional EU funds.
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The dataset does not contain any identification of the thematic nature of the investments made. This is because there was no harmonised system or information available across funds and across programme periods to estimate the thematic composition of the investments. For the ERDF and Cohesion Fund the studies cited above provided some thematic information for specific programme periods.
2. SCOPE
2.1 REGIONALISATION: This dataset provides the most complete historic picture available to date on the annual EU payments made - in EUR in current prices of the year in question (not adjusted or expressed as “in 2015 prices”) - under different shared management funds mapped to or estimated by NUTS-2 regions;
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
The work undertaken to regionalise the payment data is predominantly based on the NUTS-2013 version as described in the final report of the 2016 WIIW study (link below). In case the EU funded programmes covered more than one NUTS-2 region the regionalisation of the payments was carried out using either (1) regionalised data provided by the managing authorities or (2) the application of certain apportioning rules to the payments in order to estimate the share of the payment by NUTS-2 region.
In regionalising the data, information on the specific national or regional funding programme, which were the source of the payments, was not retained in the processing of the dataset.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
In order to develop a more realistic estimate of the annual profile of real expenditure, the Commission tasked BERGEN to undertake work to develop a modelling of the “real” annual expenditure on the ground, and to test the robustness and sensitivity of assumptions used (see link to final report below).
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
Updated
May 29 2020
Views
437
1. PURPOSE: This data set provides, in a single source, regionalised (NUTS-2) annual EU expenditure data (in current prices) for specific EU funds - ERDF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD/EAGGF and ESF. This data can be used, among other purposes, to facilitate analysis on the effects of the EU funds.
In terms of the regionalisation of EU payments made, this work expands and replaces data sets previous published on the ERDF and Cohesion fund with additional years and additional EU funds.
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The dataset does not contain any identification of the thematic nature of the investments made. This is because there was no harmonised system or information available across funds and across programme periods to estimate the thematic composition of the investments. For the ERDF and Cohesion Fund the studies cited above provided some thematic information for specific programme periods.
2. SCOPE
2.1 REGIONALISATION: This dataset provides the most complete historic picture available to date on the annual EU payments made - in EUR in current prices of the year in question (not adjusted or expressed as “in 2015 prices”) - under different shared management funds mapped to or estimated by NUTS-2 regions;
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
The work undertaken to regionalise the payment data is predominantly based on the NUTS-2013 version as described in the final report of the 2016 WIIW study (link below). In case the EU funded programmes covered more than one NUTS-2 region the regionalisation of the payments was carried out using either (1) regionalised data provided by the managing authorities or (2) the application of certain apportioning rules to the payments in order to estimate the share of the payment by NUTS-2 region.
In regionalising the data, information on the specific national or regional funding programme, which were the source of the payments, was not retained in the processing of the dataset.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
In order to develop a more realistic estimate of the annual profile of real expenditure, the Commission tasked BERGEN to undertake work to develop a modelling of the “real” annual expenditure on the ground, and to test the robustness and sensitivity of assumptions used (see link to final report below).
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
Updated
May 29 2020
Views
32,877
Filtered View
1. PURPOSE: This data set provides, in a single source, regionalised (NUTS-2) annual EU expenditure data (in current prices) for specific EU funds - ERDF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD/EAGGF and ESF. This data can be used, among other purposes, to facilitate analysis on the effects of the EU funds.
In terms of the regionalisation of EU payments made, this work expands and replaces data sets previous published on the ERDF and Cohesion fund with additional years and additional EU funds.
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The dataset does not contain any identification of the thematic nature of the investments made. This is because there was no harmonised system or information available across funds and across programme periods to estimate the thematic composition of the investments. For the ERDF and Cohesion Fund the studies cited above provided some thematic information for specific programme periods.
2. SCOPE
2.1 REGIONALISATION: This dataset provides the most complete historic picture available to date on the annual EU payments made - in EUR in current prices of the year in question (not adjusted or expressed as “in 2015 prices”) - under different shared management funds mapped to or estimated by NUTS-2 regions;
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
The work undertaken to regionalise the payment data is predominantly based on the NUTS-2013 version as described in the final report of the 2016 WIIW study (link below). In case the EU funded programmes covered more than one NUTS-2 region the regionalisation of the payments was carried out using either (1) regionalised data provided by the managing authorities or (2) the application of certain apportioning rules to the payments in order to estimate the share of the payment by NUTS-2 region.
In regionalising the data, information on the specific national or regional funding programme, which were the source of the payments, was not retained in the processing of the dataset.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
In order to develop a more realistic estimate of the annual profile of real expenditure, the Commission tasked BERGEN to undertake work to develop a modelling of the “real” annual expenditure on the ground, and to test the robustness and sensitivity of assumptions used (see link to final report below).
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
Updated
May 29 2020
Views
974
Filtered View
This dataset presents information on EU payments to the ESI Funds programmes as well as to FEAD, IPA-E and ENI supported programmes.
Annual snapshots are provided in the data and therefore the data must be filtered by year to have an accurate view of the total EU planned amount and payments made.
Data is reported on cumulative basis, i.e. the amounts shown in 2017 represent the cumulative payments made from the beginning of the programming period (2014-2017 up to date).
The dataset is updated on a daily basis.
Annual snapshots are provided in the data and therefore the data must be filtered by year to have an accurate view of the total EU planned amount and payments made.
Data is reported on cumulative basis, i.e. the amounts shown in 2017 represent the cumulative payments made from the beginning of the programming period (2014-2017 up to date).
The dataset is updated on a daily basis.
Updated
December 5 2023
Views
558
Filtered View
This dataset presents information on EU payments to the ESI Funds programmes as well as to FEAD, IPA-E and ENI supported programmes.
Annual snapshots are provided in the data and therefore the data must be filtered by year to have an accurate view of the total EU planned amount and payments made.
Data is reported on cumulative basis, i.e. the amounts shown in 2017 represent the cumulative payments made from the beginning of the programming period (2014-2017 up to date).
The dataset is updated on a daily basis.
Annual snapshots are provided in the data and therefore the data must be filtered by year to have an accurate view of the total EU planned amount and payments made.
Data is reported on cumulative basis, i.e. the amounts shown in 2017 represent the cumulative payments made from the beginning of the programming period (2014-2017 up to date).
The dataset is updated on a daily basis.
Updated
December 5 2023
Views
364
This data set provides information on the indicative list of major projects from the ERDF and Cohesion Fund programmes 2014-2020 and details on the projects so far presented for the approval of the Commission. The data set will be updated regularly to reflect changes in the programme lists and major project notifications. Financial Data is in current prices.
‘Major Projects’ are usually large-scale infrastructure projects in the transport and environment sectors, but some may also involve investments in the energy, research, ICT and other sectors supported by the ERDF or the Cohesion Fund. The total eligible cost for a project to be designated "major" is generally more than € 50 million, but € 75m for transport and energy networks under Thematic Objective 7 - Transport and other strategic networks. Due to their scale and importance the planned major projects are specifically listed in the Operational Programmes and are then subject to an assessment and a specific approval by the European Commission on the basis of documentation including Cost-Benefit Analysis and feasibility studies.
To facilitate their assessment various procedures for sending major projects to the Commission are provided for. (There are separate procedures for projects phased between different financing periods). The Member States are recommended to use independent experts (from the JASPERS initiative) to appraise their projects.
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change you regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
July 4 2023
Views
55,721
Filtered View
This dataset presents information on EU payments to the ESI Funds programmes as well as to FEAD, IPA-E and ENI supported programmes.
Annual snapshots are provided in the data and therefore the data **must** be filtered by year to have an accurate view of the total EU planned amount and payments made.
Data is reported on cumulative basis, i.e. the amounts shown in 2017 represent the cumulative payments made from the beginning of the programming period (2014-2017 up to date).
The dataset is updated on a daily basis.
Annual snapshots are provided in the data and therefore the data **must** be filtered by year to have an accurate view of the total EU planned amount and payments made.
Data is reported on cumulative basis, i.e. the amounts shown in 2017 represent the cumulative payments made from the beginning of the programming period (2014-2017 up to date).
The dataset is updated on a daily basis.
Updated
December 5 2023
Views
1,315
This dataset provides the *planned* EU allocation to categorisation system codes as adopted in ERDF, CF and ESF programmes at the end 2008 and the end of 2015.
The values at the moment of closure of the period 2007-2013 are provided in this dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2007-2013/ESIF-2007-2013-categorisation-raw-data-from-closur/qt3c-wiyg
Each row presents a volume of EU support allocated to a categorisation dimension codes. The programme documents only provided planned financial information on three dimensions, namely;
- Priority themes (actions supported)
- Form of Finance (grants, loans, etc.)
- Territorial context (urban, rural, etc.)
- Priority themes (actions supported)
- Form of Finance (grants, loans, etc.)
- Territorial context (urban, rural, etc.)
The full categorisation information system 2007-2013 was composed of 5 dimension providing information on:
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Information on the last two dimensions was not provided in the programmes but only in the annual reporting.
- Priority themes (activities supported)
- Form of Finance
- Territorial context
- Location (NUTS codes)
- Economic Dimension
Information on the last two dimensions was not provided in the programmes but only in the annual reporting.
This data is of interest because it allows an analysis of time of the planned use of the EU support by 3 different dimensions. I show the detailed changes in thematic allocation between 2008 and 2015 allowing to look re-progamming.
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
More background information on the categorisation system 2007-2013 is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/data-for-research/
Updated
May 23 2020
Views
2,184
Tags
A-Z
- 100% (1)
- 1988-1993 (4)
- 1994-1999 (4)
- 2000-2006 (4)
- 2007-2013 (150)
- 2010 (1)
- 2014-2020 (129)
- 2014-2020 allocations (35)
- 2019 (2)
- 2020 (1)
- 2021-2027 (4)
- 2021-2027 initial allocations (1)
- 2040 vision (1)
- 8th cohesion report (1)
- absorption (6)
- achievements (9)
- administration (1)
- agriculture (1)
- aid intensity (2)
- air (1)
- air quality (36)
- airport (1)
- allocations 2021-2027 (1)
- ambulances (1)
- amif (1)
- annual (5)
- annual pre-financing (3)
- area (1)
- article 7 (1)
- awareness (1)
- axis (1)
- bar chart (1)
- benchmarking (2)
- beneficiaries (3)
- beyond gdp (3)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity tracking (1)
- blog (2)
- broadband (36)
- business development (34)
- capacity building (1)
- carbon footprint (1)
- carbon intensity (2)
- categories of region (3)
- categorisation (32)
- categorisation data (1)
- categorisation system (1)
- category of region (88)
- cci (3)
- cf (128)
- chronology (1)
- circular economy (1)
- cities (1)
- citizens’ perception (2)
- clean transport (3)
- clean urban transport (2)
- climate action (3)
- climate adaptation (3)
- climate change (1)
- climate mitigation (2)
- climate tracking (2)
- clld (1)
- closure (1)
- co-financing (1)
- co2 (1)
- cohesion (4)
- cohesion fund
- cohesion policy (172)
- cohesion report (1)
- cohesionfund (1)
- commitment plan (1)
- common indicators (21)
- common output (1)
- common result (1)
- communciation (9)
- competitiveness (3)
- core (3)
- core indicators (134)
- coronavirus (5)
- coronavirus response (4)
- costs (3)
- counterfactual (2)
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations (1)
- coverage (1)
- covid (13)
- covid pandemic (1)
- covid vaccine (1)
- covid-19 (19)
- covid19 (7)
- creating charts (1)
- crii (9)
- crii+ (2)
- cross-cutting_themes (1)
- culture (10)
- cycle paths (1)
- cycling (1)
- data story (1)
- datastory (1)
- decided (4)
- decided finances (1)
- declarations (1)
- decommitment (3)
- demographic change (1)
- deprived communities (2)
- detailed themes (1)
- development chronology (1)
- dg regional and urban policy (133)
- digital skills (1)
- digital transition (1)
- dimensions (1)
- disaster support (1)
- disasters (1)
- drinking water (1)
- drought (2)
- e-business (1)
- e-commerce (1)
- e-government; digitisation (1)
- e-health (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-tourism (1)
- eafrd (102)
- eaggf (6)
- earthquakes (2)
- econometric (1)
- econometric modelling (1)
- economic activity (1)
- economic sector (1)
- economic sectors (1)
- edrf (1)
- education (1)
- education infrastructure (35)
- efficiency (3)
- election results (1)
- eligibility (2)
- emergency services (2)
- emfaf (1)
- emff (94)
- energy (37)
- energy efficiency (1)
- energy union (1)
- eni (7)
- enterprise (1)
- enterprise support (2)
- enterprises (1)
- environment (36)
- eonomometric (5)
- equity (4)
- erdf (143)
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020 (6)
- esf (139)
- esf participants (1)
- esf participation (34)
- esf+ (1)
- esf+ secondary theme (1)
- esi funds (89)
- esif (20)
- esif odp (1)
- eu (4)
- eu allocations (1)
- eu budget (1)
- eu countries (6)
- eu discontent (1)
- eu funding per capita (2)
- eu payment (6)
- eu payments (5)
- eu regional policy (3)
- eu solidarity fund (1)
- eu-spi (2)
- eurobarometer (1)
- eurobarometer awareness eu regional policy (1)
- eurobarometer perception eu regional policy (1)
- eurobarometer priorities eu regional policy (1)
- european regional competitiveness index (2)
- eurosceptisism (1)
- eurostat (1)
- eusf (2)
- euspi (1)
- evaluation (13)
- evaluations (1)
- ex post evaluation (1)
- excess deaths (1)
- expenditure (12)
- faq (1)
- fead (7)
- fead open data (1)
- feedback (1)
- female advantage (2)
- female disadvantage (2)
- finances implemented (5)
- financial instruments (5)
- financial plans (1)
- fire (10)
- fire prevention (1)
- fires (1)
- firms (3)
- flood prevention (1)
- floods (11)
- flying flags (2)
- foot paths (1)
- forest fires (1)
- form of finance (23)
- form of support (1)
- forthcoming (1)
- framework (1)
- frequently asked questions (1)
- ftth (1)
- fund (90)
- fund of funds (4)
- funds (5)
- future developments (1)
- gdp (5)
- gender (1)
- gender budgeting (1)
- gender equality (3)
- gender monitor (1)
- gender targeting (1)
- gender tracking (1)
- geographic characteristics (1)
- ghg (2)
- ghg emissions (1)
- glass ceiling (1)
- green (1)
- green deal (3)
- green tracking (1)
- gross fixed capital formation (1)
- guarantee funds (1)
- guarantees (3)
- health (7)
- health emergencies (1)
- health infrastructure (35)
- healthcare (4)
- heritage (1)
- historic data (4)
- historic payments (7)
- hospitals (2)
- how to (1)
- icu beds (1)
- ijg (1)
- impact (1)
- implementation evaluations (1)
- implemented (11)
- in profile (1)
- index (6)
- indicator (2)
- indicators (10)
- indicators by operation (1)
- indice (1)
- inequality (2)
- infrastructure (2)
- initial allocation (1)
- initial pre-financing (2)
- inland waterways (1)
- innovation (38)
- integrated (1)
- inter modal (2)
- interim payments (3)
- interreg (2)
- intervention field (21)
- intervention fields (6)
- intervention_fields (1)
- investment progress (4)
- investments (1)
- ip (2)
- ipa (1)
- ipae (7)
- island (1)
- iti (1)
- jtf (2)
- just transition (1)
- kohesio (1)
- labour market (34)
- large enterprises (1)
- less developped (2)
- loan (1)
- loan funds (1)
- loands (1)
- loans (2)
- location (1)
- lookup (1)
- low carbon (2)
- low carbon transport (1)
- macro region (1)
- macro-regional and sea basin strategies (1)
- mainstreaming (1)
- major projects (5)
- maritime safety (1)
- measure level (1)
- medecines (1)
- medicine (1)
- member state (2)
- member states (1)
- migration (1)
- modelling (6)
- monitoring (1)
- more developped (2)
- most deprived (1)
- mountain (1)
- mp (4)
- multi modal (2)
- multimodal (35)
- national parks (1)
- natura 2000 (1)
- natural areas (1)
- nature (1)
- net zero (1)
- new enterprises (1)