55 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > cohesion fund
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
Categories
Tags
- cohesion fund
- 100%
- 2010
- 2020
- 2021-2027 initial allocations
- 2040 vision
- 8th cohesion report
- administration
- agriculture
- air
- airport
- allocations 2021-2027
- ambulances
- amif
- area
- article 7
- awareness
- axis
- bar chart
- biodiversity tracking
- capacity building
- carbon footprint
- categorisation data
- categorisation system
- chronology
- circular economy
- cities
- climate change
- clld
- closure
- co-financing
- co2
- cohesion report
- cohesionfund
- commitment plan
- common output
- common result
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations
- coverage
- covid pandemic
- covid vaccine
- creating charts
- cross-cutting_themes
- cycle paths
- cycling
- data story
- datastory
- decided finances
- declarations
- demographic change
- detailed themes
- development chronology
- digital skills
- digital tracking
- digital transition
- dimensions
- disaster support
- disasters
- drinking water
- e-business
- e-commerce
- e-government; digitisation
- e-health
- e-learning
- e-tourism
- econometric
- econometric modelling
- economic activity
- economic sector
- economic sectors
- edrf
- education
- election results
- emfaf
- energy efficiency
- energy union
- enterprise
- enterprises
- esf participants
- esf+
- esf+ secondary theme
- esif odp
- eu allocations
- eu and total finances planned; climate action
- eu budget
- eu discontent
- eu solidarity fund
- eurobarometer
- eurobarometer awareness eu regional policy
- eurobarometer perception eu regional policy
- eurobarometer priorities eu regional policy
- eurosceptisism
- eurostat
- euspi
- evaluations
- ex post evaluation
- excess deaths
- faq
- fead open data
- feedback
- financial plans
- fire prevention
- fires
- flood prevention
- foot paths
- forest fires
- form of support
- forthcoming
- framework
- frequently asked questions
- ftth
- future developments
- gender
- gender budgeting
- gender monitor
- gender targeting
- gender tracking
- geographic characteristics
- ghg
- glass ceiling
- green
- green tracking
- gross fixed capital formation
- guarantee funds
- health emergencies
- heritage
- how to
- icu beds
- ijg
- impact
- implementation evaluations
- in profile
- indicators by operation
- indice
- initial allocation
- inland waterways
- integrated
- intervention_fields
- investments
- ipa
- island
- iti
- just transition
- large enterprises
- loan
- loan funds
- loands
- location
- lookup
- low carbon transport
- macro region
- macro-regional and sea basin strategies
- mainstreaming
- maritime safety
- measure level
- medecines
- medicine
- member states
- migration
- monitoring
- most deprived
- mountain
- national parks
- natura 2000
- natural areas
- nature
- new enterprises
- nomenclature des unités territoriales
- nuts 2 2016
- nuts 2010
- nuts allocation
- nuts codes
- nuts3
- operational programme
- outermost
- over programming
- pa
- pandemic
- payment execution
- payments
- peer to peer
- perceptions
- performance
- performance framework
- performance review
- pie chart
- planned development
- pollution
- port
- ppe
- pre-accession
- pre-financing
- preliminary allocations
- programming outcome
- progress
- project selection
- projects
- qanda
- raw data
- recycling
- region
- regional coverage
- regional development trap
- regional gdp
- regional innovation
- regions
- renewables
- reprogrammming
- research institutes
- reserve
- resources
- results
- review
- rtd
- rup
- rural development
- sanitation
- scatterplot
- scores
- sdg 6
- sectoral data
- selected operations
- selection rate
- singaling
- skills
- small enterprises
- smart grids
- sme
- sme financing
- social
- social progress
- sparsely populated
- specific indicators
- specific objective
- start-ups
- strategies
- structural funds
- studies
- sud
- sump
- survey
- sustainable development goals
- ta
- taiex
- technology
- ten-t
- territorial development
- territorial focus
- territory types
- thematic allocations
- thematic data
- thematic objectives
- themes
- theory based
- theory based evaluation
- time
- time series
- totaluncashedrecoveryamountfromyear
- tourist attractions
- track
- tracking mechanisms
- transnational
- uban transport
- urban development
- urban mobility
- user feedback
- user profile
- user satisfaction
- user surveysts
- uwwtd
- vaccination
- vaccines
- variation
- ventilators
- venture capital
- visualization
- vocational skills
- waste treatment
- waste water
- water
- water conservation
- water framework
- water supply
- wellbeing
- working capital
- year
- yei participants
- z scores
- 2019
- aid intensity
- benchmarking
- beneficiaries
- biodiversity
- blog
- citizens’ perception
- clean urban transport
- climate mitigation
- climate tracking
- counterfactual
- crii+
- deprived communities
- drought
- earthquakes
- eligibility
- emergency services
- enterprise support
- eu funding per capita
- eu-spi
- european regional competitiveness index
- eusf
- female advantage
- female disadvantage
- flying flags
- hospitals
- indicator
- inequality
- infrastructure
- initial pre-financing
- inter modal
- interreg
- ip
- jtf
- less developped
- loans
- low carbon
- member state
- more developped
- multi modal
- non-paper
- nuts 3
- outputs
- performance reserve
- priority theme
- programmes
- public health
- public investment
- r+d activities
- rail
- rates
- regional competitiveness
- regional competitiveness index 2019
- reprogramming
- rtd activities
- rtd infrastructure
- rural
- science parks
- sdgs
- sectors
- smart growth
- social progress index
- solidarity
- specific funds
- statistics
- storms
- story
- success
- sustainable urban development
- technology institutes
- territory
- thematic concentration
- thematic investment volumes
- theme
- transition
- un
- universities
- urban
- user survey
- vaccine
- annual pre-financing
- beyond gdp
- categories of region
- cci
- clean transport
- climate action
- climate adaptation
- competitiveness
- core
- costs
- decommitment
- efficiency
- eu regional policy
- firms
- gender equality
- green deal
- guarantees
- interim payments
- nuts 2
- operations
- paid
- participation
- partnership agreement
- react-eu
- recoveries
- regression
- sustainable
- tracking
- user guide
- 1988-1993
- 1994-1999
- 2000-2006
- 2021-2027
- cohesion
- coronavirus response
- decided
- equity
- eu
- fund of funds
- healthcare
- historic data
- investment progress
- major projects
- mp
- population
- spi
- targets
- vcf
- annual
- coronavirus
- eonomometric
- eu payments
- finances implemented
- financial instruments
- funds
- gdp
- rci
- absorption
- eaggf
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020
- eu countries
- eu payment
- index
- intervention fields
- modelling
- nuts
- payment timeseries
- regional policy
- regionalised
- covid19
- eni
- fead
- health
- historic payments
- ipae
- nuts2
- achievements
- communciation
- crii
- nuts-2
- culture
- fire
- indicators
- risk prevention
- tourism
- floods
- implemented
- expenditure
- covid
- evaluation
- thematic objectives erdf esf cf 2014-2020
- planned
- selected
- covid-19
- esif
- common indicators
- intervention field
- territorial delivery mechanism
- territorial dimension
- form of finance
- categorisation
- business development
- esf participation
- labour market
- social inclusion
- 2014-2020 allocations
- education infrastructure
- health infrastructure
- multimodal
- ports
- rtdi
- spending category
- technical assistance
- waste water treatment
- air quality
- broadband
- environment
- railway
- road
- transport
- urban transport
- energy
- innovation
- research
- smes
- priority axis
- category of region
- thematic objective
- esi funds
- fund
- programme
- emff
- yei
- eafrd
- cf
- 2014-2020
- dg regional and urban policy
- core indicators
- esf
- erdf
- 2007-2013
- cohesion policy
55 Results
filtered by
Tags > cohesion fund
Clear All
Filtered View
1. PURPOSE: This data set provides, in a single source, regionalised (NUTS-2) annual EU expenditure data (in current prices) for specific EU funds - ERDF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD/EAGGF and ESF. This data can be used, among other purposes, to facilitate analysis on the effects of the EU funds.
In terms of the regionalisation of EU payments made, this work expands and replaces data sets previous published on the ERDF and Cohesion fund with additional years and additional EU funds.
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The dataset does not contain any identification of the thematic nature of the investments made. This is because there was no harmonised system or information available across funds and across programme periods to estimate the thematic composition of the investments. For the ERDF and Cohesion Fund the studies cited above provided some thematic information for specific programme periods.
2. SCOPE
2.1 REGIONALISATION: This dataset provides the most complete historic picture available to date on the annual EU payments made - in EUR in current prices of the year in question (not adjusted or expressed as “in 2015 prices”) - under different shared management funds mapped to or estimated by NUTS-2 regions;
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
The work undertaken to regionalise the payment data is predominantly based on the NUTS-2013 version as described in the final report of the 2016 WIIW study (link below). In case the EU funded programmes covered more than one NUTS-2 region the regionalisation of the payments was carried out using either (1) regionalised data provided by the managing authorities or (2) the application of certain apportioning rules to the payments in order to estimate the share of the payment by NUTS-2 region.
In regionalising the data, information on the specific national or regional funding programme, which were the source of the payments, was not retained in the processing of the dataset.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
In order to develop a more realistic estimate of the annual profile of real expenditure, the Commission tasked BERGEN to undertake work to develop a modelling of the “real” annual expenditure on the ground, and to test the robustness and sensitivity of assumptions used (see link to final report below).
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
Updated
December 7 2022
Views
551
Filtered View
1. PURPOSE: This data set provides, in a single source, regionalised (NUTS-2) annual EU expenditure data (in current prices) for specific EU funds - ERDF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD/EAGGF and ESF. This data can be used, among other purposes, to facilitate analysis on the effects of the EU funds.
In terms of the regionalisation of EU payments made, this work expands and replaces data sets previous published on the ERDF and Cohesion fund with additional years and additional EU funds.
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The following studies on ERDF and Cohesion fund expenditure are to a large extent now superseded:
- "Geography of expenditure" Work Package 13 of the ERDF and CF ex-post evaluation 2007-2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ec/2007-2013/#13
- "Final Report - ERDF and CF Regional Expenditure" (2000-2006) - SWECo 2008 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/expenditure_final.pdf
- "The Territorial Effects of the Structural Funds" (1994-1999) - ESPON 2005, study 2.2.1 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_ESPON2006Projects/Menu_PolicyImpactProjects/structuralfundsimpact.html
The dataset does not contain any identification of the thematic nature of the investments made. This is because there was no harmonised system or information available across funds and across programme periods to estimate the thematic composition of the investments. For the ERDF and Cohesion Fund the studies cited above provided some thematic information for specific programme periods.
2. SCOPE
2.1 REGIONALISATION: This dataset provides the most complete historic picture available to date on the annual EU payments made - in EUR in current prices of the year in question (not adjusted or expressed as “in 2015 prices”) - under different shared management funds mapped to or estimated by NUTS-2 regions;
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
=> presented in the column "EU_payment_annual".
The work undertaken to regionalise the payment data is predominantly based on the NUTS-2013 version as described in the final report of the 2016 WIIW study (link below). In case the EU funded programmes covered more than one NUTS-2 region the regionalisation of the payments was carried out using either (1) regionalised data provided by the managing authorities or (2) the application of certain apportioning rules to the payments in order to estimate the share of the payment by NUTS-2 region.
In regionalising the data, information on the specific national or regional funding programme, which were the source of the payments, was not retained in the processing of the dataset.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
2.2 MODELLING OF “REAL” EXPENDITURE: The yearly breakdown of the dataset follows the cycle of the European Commission payments to the Member States and not the date on which real expenditures took place on the ground. This characteristic may negatively affect any subsequent analytic work to carry out policy assessments.
In order to develop a more realistic estimate of the annual profile of real expenditure, the Commission tasked BERGEN to undertake work to develop a modelling of the “real” annual expenditure on the ground, and to test the robustness and sensitivity of assumptions used (see link to final report below).
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
=> the modelled annual expenditure is presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure" and it represents the mean of 100 000 simulations on the annual EU payments to estimate real expenditure.
=> The column "Standard_Deviation_of modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the standard deviation of the “modelled_annual_expenditure" which is the root mean square of the set of deviations between each estimated annual payment in 100 000 simulations and the mean of the estimations, presented in the column "Modelled_annual_expenditure”.
=> The column "Standard_Error_of_modelled_annual_expenditure" provides the Standard Error of the "Modelled_annual_expenditure", which is a measure of how far this mean is likely to be from its expected value; that is, its scatter in repeated ex
Updated
October 8 2020
Views
934
This file contains categorisation data from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes and in particular it compares **PLANNED AMOUNTS TO IMPLEMENTED INVESTMENTS**.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted.
***NEW*** 03/2020 - The Commission's COVID-19 response in 2020 involves encouraging reprogramming unallocated EU budget towards the COVID-19 health response and support to the economy, particularly through supporting SMEs and workers. Check out these data stories based on this dataset:
- HEALTH: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/In-profile-cohesion-policy-improving-health-servic/qyuv-h9j2
- SMEs: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/An-Economy-that-works-for-people-Cohesion-Policy-s/n4ee-2h83
- HEALTH: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/In-profile-cohesion-policy-improving-health-servic/qyuv-h9j2
- SMEs: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/An-Economy-that-works-for-people-Cohesion-Policy-s/n4ee-2h83
***NEW*** 12/2018 - CLIMATE AND BIODIVERSITY TRACKING: In December 2018 the calculation of amounts planned, decided and spend on categorisation codes (weighted 100% and 40%) for climate tracking and biodiversity tracking were added to the dataset to allow full transparency on how investment under these tracking systems are progressing. Specially designed charts providing visualisations on these tracking systems are linked to the dataset below.
***NEW*** 12/2018 - OPERATIONS (projects) SELECTED: Also in December 2018 the number of operations (projects) linked to each categorisation value reported by priority axis is reflected in the dataset. In many cases programmes provide detailed categorisation information, reporting more than one intervention field code for a specific operation. While leading to more detailed thematic information it leads to multiple reporting of some operations.
TIMING AND FREQUENCY: The categorisation system implementation values are reported once a year by the 350+ programmes at end January. It is then published in this dataset towards the end of February. Thereafter the data is updated regularly to reflect the updated information transmitted by the programmes.
This dataset currently contains data to end-2016 and end- 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
This dataset currently contains data to end-2016 and end- 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
STRUCTURE OF DATASET:
The planned data is provided in tables one for each priority axis (investment pillar) of each programme. The categorisation systems is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions in total - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only four4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while five5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on three3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare.
In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
The planned data is provided in tables one for each priority axis (investment pillar) of each programme. The categorisation systems is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions in total - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only four4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while five5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on three3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare.
In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
ANALYSING THEMATIC CONTENT AND PROGRESS: A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That "lookup" dataset also has the "climate change tracking" and "biodiversity tracking" weightings.
Updated
September 14 2023
Views
43,814
This file contains lists of the 2014-2020 categorisation dimensions and codes based on the linked dataset presenting the financial values planned and implemented.
The categorisation systems is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions in total - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on 3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
Updated
September 14 2023
Views
946
Filtered View
This dataset provides information on expected achievements (targets) set for selected common indicators defined for the each of the specific ESI funds and the decided (forecasts from selected projects) and implemented values.
The reference date for the annual reporting of progress by the programmes achievements is the end of each calendar year.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
For more information on the common indicator definitions used by each fund please go to the "Related Information" sections at the bottom of the fund specific pages.
Updated
March 17 2023
Views
1,229
Filtered View
This dataset provides information on expected achievements (targets) set for selected common indicators defined for the each of the specific ESI funds and the decided (forecasts from selected projects) and implemented values.
The reference date for the annual reporting of progress by the programmes achievements is the end of each calendar year.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
For more information on the common indicator definitions used by each fund please go to the "Related Information" sections at the bottom of the fund specific pages.
Updated
March 17 2023
Views
406
Filtered View
This dataset provides information on expected achievements (targets) set for selected common indicators defined for the each of the specific ESI funds and the decided (forecasts from selected projects) and implemented values.
The reference date for the annual reporting of progress by the programmes achievements is the end of each calendar year.
This dataset contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
This dataset contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
For more information on the common indicator definitions used by each fund please go to the "Related Information" sections at the bottom of the fund specific pages.
The same data on the **programme specific indicators** (including output and result indicators) is available in this separate dataset: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/2014-2020-Indicators/ESIF-2014-2020-Achievement-Details-ERDF-CF-Program/3de9-gnka
Updated
March 17 2023
Views
449
Filtered View
This dataset provides information on expected achievements (targets) set for selected common indicators defined for the each of the specific ESI funds and the decided (forecasts from selected projects) and implemented values.
The reference date for the annual reporting of progress by the programmes achievements is the end of each calendar year.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
For more information on the common indicator definitions used by each fund please go to the "Related Information" sections at the bottom of the fund specific pages.
Updated
March 17 2023
Views
166
Filtered View
This file contains categorisation data from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes and in particular it compares **PLANNED AMOUNTS TO IMPLEMENTED INVESTMENTS**.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted.
The data will be updated regularly to reflect updated information transmitted.
***NEW*** 03/2020 - The Commission's COVID-19 response in 2020 involves encouraging reprogramming unallocated EU budget towards the COVID-19 health response and support to the economy, particularly through supporting SMEs and workers. Check out these data stories based on this dataset:
- HEALTH: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/In-profile-cohesion-policy-improving-health-servic/qyuv-h9j2
- SMEs: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/An-Economy-that-works-for-people-Cohesion-Policy-s/n4ee-2h83
- HEALTH: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/In-profile-cohesion-policy-improving-health-servic/qyuv-h9j2
- SMEs: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/An-Economy-that-works-for-people-Cohesion-Policy-s/n4ee-2h83
***NEW*** 12/2018 - CLIMATE AND BIODIVERSITY TRACKING: In December 2018 the calculation of amounts planned, decided and spend on categorisation codes (weighted 100% and 40%) for climate tracking and biodiversity tracking were added to the dataset to allow full transparency on how investment under these tracking systems are progressing. Specially designed charts providing visualisations on these tracking systems are linked to the dataset below.
***NEW*** 12/2018 - OPERATIONS (projects) SELECTED: Also in December 2018 the number of operations (projects) linked to each categorisation value reported by priority axis is reflected in the dataset. In many cases programmes provide detailed categorisation information, reporting more than one intervention field code for a specific operation. While leading to more detailed thematic information it leads to multiple reporting of some operations.
TIMING AND FREQUENCY: The categorisation system implementation values are reported once a year by the 350+ programmes at end January. It is then published in this dataset towards the end of February. Thereafter the data is updated regularly to reflect the updated information transmitted by the programmes.
This dataset currently contains data to end-2016 and end- 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
This dataset currently contains data to end-2016 and end- 2017. As the data is cumulative the **ANNUAL VALUES SHOULD NOT BE AGGREGATED *** but may be compared to see progress.
STRUCTURE OF DATASET:
The planned data is provided in tables one for each priority axis (investment pillar) of each programme. The categorisation systems is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions in total - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only four4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while five5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on three3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare.
In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
The planned data is provided in tables one for each priority axis (investment pillar) of each programme. The categorisation systems is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions in total - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only four4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while five5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. Data on three3 other dimensions is only provided in the implementation reports - Location, Economic Dimension, ERDF/CF Thematic Objective - and therefore there is no planned amount to compare.
In analysing the content of the dataset **THE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE ANALYSED SEPARATELY AS OTHERWISE DOUBLE COUNTING OF FINANCIAL AMOUNTS WILL OCCUR**.
This information note provides more detail on the categorisation system 2014-2020: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_categorisation_climate_en.pdf
ANALYSING THEMATIC CONTENT AND PROGRESS: A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That "lookup" dataset also has the "climate change tracking" and "biodiversity tracking" weightings.
Updated
September 14 2023
Views
297
Filtered View
This dataset provides information on expected achievements (targets) set for selected common indicators defined for the each of the specific ESI funds and the decided (forecasts from selected projects) and implemented values.
The reference date for the annual reporting of progress by the programmes achievements is the end of each calendar year.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
This dataset was extracted on **12 December 2017** and contains:
- Time series of the cumulative amounts reported annually for decided and implemented values (i.e. 2016 values include the 2015 values);
- To avoid double counting, the cumulative values from different years **should NOT be aggregated**;
- Allows comparison of the targets year on year (targets change with reallocation of financial resources);
- Allows comparison of decided (forecast) and implemented values with the targets set (allowing users to calculate the % rate of progress);
- For ESF / YEI only the implemented values are reported (no decided (forecast) values) and targets were not obligatory in each case.
For more information on the common indicator definitions used by each fund please go to the "Related Information" sections at the bottom of the fund specific pages.
Updated
March 17 2023
Views
373
Tags
A-Z
- 100% (1)
- 1988-1993 (4)
- 1994-1999 (4)
- 2000-2006 (4)
- 2007-2013 (150)
- 2010 (1)
- 2014-2020 (129)
- 2014-2020 allocations (35)
- 2019 (2)
- 2020 (1)
- 2021-2027 (4)
- 2021-2027 initial allocations (1)
- 2040 vision (1)
- 8th cohesion report (1)
- absorption (6)
- achievements (9)
- administration (1)
- agriculture (1)
- aid intensity (2)
- air (1)
- air quality (36)
- airport (1)
- allocations 2021-2027 (1)
- ambulances (1)
- amif (1)
- annual (5)
- annual pre-financing (3)
- area (1)
- article 7 (1)
- awareness (1)
- axis (1)
- bar chart (1)
- benchmarking (2)
- beneficiaries (2)
- beyond gdp (3)
- biodiversity (2)
- biodiversity tracking (1)
- blog (2)
- broadband (36)
- business development (34)
- capacity building (1)
- carbon footprint (1)
- categories of region (3)
- categorisation (32)
- categorisation data (1)
- categorisation system (1)
- category of region (88)
- cci (3)
- cf (128)
- chronology (1)
- circular economy (1)
- cities (1)
- citizens’ perception (2)
- clean transport (3)
- clean urban transport (2)
- climate action (3)
- climate adaptation (3)
- climate change (1)
- climate mitigation (2)
- climate tracking (2)
- clld (1)
- closure (1)
- co-financing (1)
- co2 (1)
- cohesion (4)
- cohesion fund
- cohesion policy (172)
- cohesion report (1)
- cohesionfund (1)
- commitment plan (1)
- common indicators (21)
- common output (1)
- common result (1)
- communciation (9)
- competitiveness (3)
- core (3)
- core indicators (134)
- coronavirus (5)
- coronavirus response (4)
- costs (3)
- counterfactual (2)
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations (1)
- coverage (1)
- covid (13)
- covid pandemic (1)
- covid vaccine (1)
- covid-19 (19)
- covid19 (7)
- creating charts (1)
- crii (9)
- crii+ (2)
- cross-cutting_themes (1)
- culture (10)
- cycle paths (1)
- cycling (1)
- data story (1)
- datastory (1)
- decided (4)
- decided finances (1)
- declarations (1)
- decommitment (3)
- demographic change (1)
- deprived communities (2)
- detailed themes (1)
- development chronology (1)
- dg regional and urban policy (133)
- digital skills (1)
- digital tracking (1)
- digital transition (1)
- dimensions (1)
- disaster support (1)
- disasters (1)
- drinking water (1)
- drought (2)
- e-business (1)
- e-commerce (1)
- e-government; digitisation (1)
- e-health (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-tourism (1)
- eafrd (102)
- eaggf (6)
- earthquakes (2)
- econometric (1)
- econometric modelling (1)
- economic activity (1)
- economic sector (1)
- economic sectors (1)
- edrf (1)
- education (1)
- education infrastructure (35)
- efficiency (3)
- election results (1)
- eligibility (2)
- emergency services (2)
- emfaf (1)
- emff (94)
- energy (37)
- energy efficiency (1)
- energy union (1)
- eni (7)
- enterprise (1)
- enterprise support (2)
- enterprises (1)
- environment (36)
- eonomometric (5)
- equity (4)
- erdf (142)
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020 (6)
- esf (138)
- esf participants (1)
- esf participation (34)
- esf+ (1)
- esf+ secondary theme (1)
- esi funds (89)
- esif (20)
- esif odp (1)
- eu (4)
- eu allocations (1)
- eu and total finances planned; climate action (1)
- eu budget (1)
- eu countries (6)
- eu discontent (1)
- eu funding per capita (2)
- eu payment (6)
- eu payments (5)
- eu regional policy (3)
- eu solidarity fund (1)
- eu-spi (2)
- eurobarometer (1)
- eurobarometer awareness eu regional policy (1)
- eurobarometer perception eu regional policy (1)
- eurobarometer priorities eu regional policy (1)
- european regional competitiveness index (2)
- eurosceptisism (1)
- eurostat (1)
- eusf (2)
- euspi (1)
- evaluation (13)
- evaluations (1)
- ex post evaluation (1)
- excess deaths (1)
- expenditure (12)
- faq (1)
- fead (7)
- fead open data (1)
- feedback (1)
- female advantage (2)
- female disadvantage (2)
- finances implemented (5)
- financial instruments (5)
- financial plans (1)
- fire (10)
- fire prevention (1)
- fires (1)
- firms (3)
- flood prevention (1)
- floods (11)
- flying flags (2)
- foot paths (1)
- forest fires (1)
- form of finance (23)
- form of support (1)
- forthcoming (1)
- framework (1)
- frequently asked questions (1)
- ftth (1)
- fund (90)
- fund of funds (4)
- funds (5)
- future developments (1)
- gdp (5)
- gender (1)
- gender budgeting (1)
- gender equality (3)
- gender monitor (1)
- gender targeting (1)
- gender tracking (1)
- geographic characteristics (1)
- ghg (1)
- glass ceiling (1)
- green (1)
- green deal (3)
- green tracking (1)
- gross fixed capital formation (1)
- guarantee funds (1)
- guarantees (3)
- health (7)
- health emergencies (1)
- health infrastructure (35)
- healthcare (4)
- heritage (1)
- historic data (4)
- historic payments (7)
- hospitals (2)
- how to (1)
- icu beds (1)
- ijg (1)
- impact (1)
- implementation evaluations (1)
- implemented (11)
- in profile (1)
- index (6)
- indicator (2)
- indicators (10)
- indicators by operation (1)
- indice (1)
- inequality (2)
- infrastructure (2)
- initial allocation (1)
- initial pre-financing (2)
- inland waterways (1)
- innovation (38)
- integrated (1)
- inter modal (2)
- interim payments (3)
- interreg (2)
- intervention field (21)
- intervention fields (6)
- intervention_fields (1)
- investment progress (4)
- investments (1)
- ip (2)
- ipa (1)
- ipae (7)
- island (1)
- iti (1)
- jtf (2)
- just transition (1)
- labour market (34)
- large enterprises (1)
- less developped (2)
- loan (1)
- loan funds (1)
- loands (1)
- loans (2)
- location (1)
- lookup (1)
- low carbon (2)
- low carbon transport (1)
- macro region (1)
- macro-regional and sea basin strategies (1)
- mainstreaming (1)
- major projects (4)
- maritime safety (1)
- measure level (1)
- medecines (1)
- medicine (1)
- member state (2)
- member states (1)
- migration (1)
- modelling (6)
- monitoring (1)
- more developped (2)
- most deprived (1)
- mountain (1)
- mp (4)
- multi modal (2)
- multimodal (35)
- national parks (1)
- natura 2000 (1)
- natural areas (1)
- nature (1)
- new enterprises (1)
- nomenclature des unités territoriales (1)
- non-paper (2)
- nuts (6)
- nuts 2 (3)
- nuts 2 2016 (1)
- nuts 2010 (1)
- nuts 3 (2)
- nuts allocation (1)
- nuts codes (1)
- nuts-2 (9)
- nuts2 (7)
- nuts3 (1)
- operational programme (1)
- operations (3)
- outermost (1)
- outputs (2)
- over programming (1)
- pa (1)
- paid (3)
- pandemic (1)
- participation (3)
- partnership agreement (3)
- payment execution (1)
- payment timeseries (6)
- payments (1)
- peer to peer (1)
- perceptions (1)
- performance (1)
- performance framework (1)
- performance reserve (2)
- performance review (1)
- pie chart (1)
- planned (15)
- planned development (1)
- pollution (1)
- population (4)
- port (1)
- ports (35)
- ppe (1)
- pre-accession (1)
- pre-financing (1)
- preliminary allocations (1)
- priority axis (87)
- priority theme (2)
- programme (90)
- programmes (2)
- programming outcome (1)
- progress (1)
- project selection (1)
- projects (1)
- public health (2)
- public investment (2)
- qanda (1)
- r+d activities (2)
- rail (2)
- railway (36)
- rates (2)
- raw data (1)
- rci (5)
- react-eu (3)
- recoveries (3)
- recycling (1)
- region (1)
- regional competitiveness (2)
- regional competitiveness index 2019 (2)
- regional coverage (1)
- regional development trap (1)
- regional gdp (1)
- regional innovation (1)
- regional policy (6)
- regionalised (6)
- regions (1)
- regression (3)
- renewables (1)
- reprogramming (2)
- reprogrammming (1)
- research (38)