11 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > floods
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
11 Results
filtered by
Tags > floods
Clear All
Although a safe place in global terms, the EU still faces multiple environmental and other risks. This data story guides you through the cohesion policy support provided to risk prevention in its multiple forms.
Updated
February 5 2021
Views
11,183
WHAT IS EUSF? The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) was set up to respond to major natural disasters and express European solidarity to disaster-stricken regions within Europe. The Fund was created as a reaction to the severe floods in Central Europe in the summer of 2002. Since then, it has been used for disasters covering a range of different catastrophic events including floods, forest fires, earthquakes, storms and drought.
The dataset presents financial and other information on the applications submitted for EUSF support between 002 and 2020.
For more information: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/solidarity-fund/
Updated
February 16 2021
Views
267
This file contains "categorisation data" from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes as adopted (including modifications). The data is in current prices. It is regularly updated to reflect reprogramming notified by the programmes.
The data is provided in tables, one for each priority axis (investment pillar), for each specific programme. The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
The Intervention field dimension is the most complete of the the different dimensions in terms of financial coverage. (NB although the SME initiative programmes were not asked to provide categorisation tables, because of simplified programming requirements, they have been manually added by DG REGIO.)
The total investments under other dimension may vary for different reasons (i.e. Technical assistance priority axes are not encoded in all dimensions, etc.)
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
September 23 2021
Views
5,818
REACT-EU provides € 50.6 billion (current prices) of fresh EU budget resources under the EU Recovery Plan - NextGenerationEU - to existing cohesion policy programmes. Check out where and for what purposes the extra money is being used.
Updated
September 16 2021
Views
4,380
This file contains "categorisation data" from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes as adopted (including modifications). The data is in current prices. It is regularly updated to reflect reprogramming notified by the programmes.
The data is provided in tables, one for each priority axis (investment pillar), for each specific programme. The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
The Intervention field dimension is the most complete of the the different dimensions in terms of financial coverage. (NB although the SME initiative programmes were not asked to provide categorisation tables, because of simplified programming requirements, they have been manually added by DG REGIO.)
The total investments under other dimension may vary for different reasons (i.e. Technical assistance priority axes are not encoded in all dimensions, etc.)
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
September 23 2021
Views
108
This file contains "categorisation data" from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes as adopted (including modifications). The data is in current prices. It is regularly updated to reflect reprogramming notified by the programmes.
The data is provided in tables, one for each priority axis (investment pillar), for each specific programme. The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
The Intervention field dimension is the most complete of the the different dimensions in terms of financial coverage. (NB although the SME initiative programmes were not asked to provide categorisation tables, because of simplified programming requirements, they have been manually added by DG REGIO.)
The total investments under other dimension may vary for different reasons (i.e. Technical assistance priority axes are not encoded in all dimensions, etc.)
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
September 23 2021
Views
140
Filtered View
This file contains "categorisation data" from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes as adopted (including modifications). The data is in current prices. It is regularly updated to reflect reprogramming notified by the programmes.
The data is provided in tables, one for each priority axis (investment pillar), for each specific programme. The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
The Intervention field dimension is the most complete of the the different dimensions in terms of financial coverage. (NB although the SME initiative programmes were not asked to provide categorisation tables, because of simplified programming requirements, they have been manually added by DG REGIO.)
The total investments under other dimension may vary for different reasons (i.e. Technical assistance priority axes are not encoded in all dimensions, etc.)
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
September 23 2021
Views
111
This file contains "categorisation data" from the ERDF/ESF programmes using REACT-EU as adopted (including modifications). The data is in current prices. It is regularly updated to reflect reprogramming notified by the programmes.
The data is provided in tables, one for each priority axis (investment pillar), for each specific programme. The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
The Intervention field dimension is the most complete of the the different dimensions in terms of financial coverage.
The total investments under other dimension may vary for different reasons (i.e. Technical assistance priority axes are not encoded in all dimensions, etc.)
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
September 23 2021
Views
127
Filtered View
This file contains "categorisation data" from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes as adopted (including modifications). The data is in current prices. It is regularly updated to reflect reprogramming notified by the programmes.
The data is provided in tables, one for each priority axis (investment pillar), for each specific programme. The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
The Intervention field dimension is the most complete of the the different dimensions in terms of financial coverage. (NB although the SME initiative programmes were not asked to provide categorisation tables, because of simplified programming requirements, they have been manually added by DG REGIO.)
The total investments under other dimension may vary for different reasons (i.e. Technical assistance priority axes are not encoded in all dimensions, etc.)
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
September 23 2021
Views
61
This file contains "categorisation data" from the ERDF/ESF/Cohesion Fund programmes as adopted (including modifications). The data is in current prices. It is regularly updated to reflect reprogramming notified by the programmes.
The data is provided in tables, one for each priority axis (investment pillar), for each specific programme. The categorisation system is defined in Implementing Regulation 215/2014 with 8 dimensions - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0215.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
These dimension represent different ways of categorising the nature of the EU support (i.e. the intervention (activity) field, the form of finance, the territorial context, etc.).
In the programme documents only 4 dimensions were encoded for ERDF/ Cohesion Fund while 5 dimensions were encoded for ESF and can be found in the dataset. In analysing the content of the dataset the different dimension should be analysed separately - **NEVER AGGREGATE VALUES ACROSS DIMENSIONS** as otherwise double counting of the financial amounts will occur.
A second dataset found here - https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/EU-Level/ESIF-2014-2020-Categorisation-Crosscutting-Themes-/xns4-t7ym - provides a lookup table for understanding how the Commission uses the intervention field codes to look at cross cutting issues such as investments in "innovation", "enterprise support", etc. That lookup dataset also has the "climate change tracking" weightings and a similar weighting system for "biodiversity tracking".
The Intervention field dimension is the most complete of the the different dimensions in terms of financial coverage. (NB although the SME initiative programmes were not asked to provide categorisation tables, because of simplified programming requirements, they have been manually added by DG REGIO.)
The total investments under other dimension may vary for different reasons (i.e. Technical assistance priority axes are not encoded in all dimensions, etc.)
If downloading, check the format of financial amounts and where necessary change your regional settings and default formatting in your chosen software. You can check the results of your aggregation of the financial data by comparing results with the pre-formatted charts profiled on this metadata page under “featured content”.
Updated
September 23 2021
Views
39
Showing 1 to 10 of 11 results
Tags
A-Z
- 100% (1)
- 1988-1993 (3)
- 1994-1999 (3)
- 2000-2006 (3)
- 2007-2013 (149)
- 2010 (1)
- 2014-2020 (125)
- 2014-2020 allocations (35)
- 2019 (2)
- 2020 (1)
- 2021-2027 (3)
- 2021-2027 initial allocations (1)
- 2040 vision (1)
- absorption (6)
- achievements (9)
- administration (1)
- agriculture (1)
- air (1)
- air quality (34)
- airport (1)
- allocations 2021-2027 (1)
- ambulances (1)
- annual (4)
- annual pre-financing (3)
- area (1)
- article 7 (1)
- awareness (1)
- axis (1)
- benchmarking (2)
- beneficiaries (1)
- beyond gdp (3)
- biodiversity (1)
- biodiversity tracking (1)
- blog (2)
- broadband (33)
- business development (32)
- capacity building (1)
- carbon footprint (1)
- categories of region (1)
- categorisation (29)
- categorisation data (1)
- categorisation system (1)
- category of region (88)
- cci (3)
- cf (125)
- chronology (1)
- circular economy (1)
- cities (1)
- citizens’ perception (2)
- clean transport (3)
- clean urban transport (2)
- climate action (1)
- climate adaptation (1)
- climate change (1)
- climate tracking (2)
- clld (1)
- closure (1)
- co-financing (1)
- co2 (1)
- cohesion (4)
- cohesion fund (52)
- cohesion policy (172)
- cohesionfund (1)
- commitment plan (1)
- common indicators (20)
- common output (1)
- common result (1)
- communciation (9)
- competitiveness (3)
- core (3)
- core indicators (134)
- coronavirus (4)
- coronavirus response (2)
- costs (3)
- counterfactual (2)
- counting projects; detailed themes; operations (1)
- coverage (1)
- covid (9)
- covid vaccine (1)
- covid-19 (13)
- covid19 (6)
- crii (8)
- crii+ (2)
- cross-cutting_themes (1)
- culture (10)
- cycle paths (1)
- cycling (1)
- data story (1)
- datastory (1)
- decided (4)
- decided finances (1)
- declarations (1)
- decommitment (3)
- deprived communities (2)
- detailed themes (1)
- development chronology (1)
- dg regional and urban policy (133)
- dimensions (1)
- disaster support (1)
- disasters (1)
- drinking water (1)
- drought (2)
- e-business (1)
- e-health (1)
- e-learning (1)
- e-tourism (1)
- eafrd (101)
- eaggf (5)
- earthquakes (2)
- econometric (1)
- econometric modelling (1)
- economic activity (1)
- economic sector (1)
- economic sectors (1)
- edrf (1)
- education infrastructure (33)
- efficiency (3)
- emergency services (2)
- emff (94)
- energy (35)
- energy efficiency (1)
- energy union (1)
- eni (7)
- enterprise (1)
- enterprise support (2)
- enterprises (1)
- environment (34)
- eonomometric (4)
- equity (2)
- erdf (139)
- erdf cf esf yei 2014-2020 (6)
- esf (135)
- esf participants (1)
- esf participation (34)
- esf+ (1)
- esf+ secondary theme (1)
- esi funds (89)
- esif (19)
- esif odp (1)
- eu (4)
- eu allocations (1)
- eu budget (1)
- eu countries (6)
- eu funding per capita (2)
- eu payment (6)
- eu payments (4)
- eu regional policy (3)
- eu solidarity fund (1)
- eu-spi (2)
- eurobarometer (1)
- eurobarometer, awareness, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, perception, eu, regional, policy (1)
- eurobarometer, priorities, eu, regional, policy (1)
- european regional competitiveness index (2)
- eusf (2)
- euspi (1)
- evaluation (13)
- evaluations (1)
- expenditure (10)
- fead (7)
- finances implemented (5)
- financial instruments (3)
- financial plans (1)
- fire (10)
- fire prevention (1)
- fires (1)
- firms (3)
- flood prevention (1)
- floods
- flying flags (2)
- foot paths (1)
- forest fires (1)
- form of finance (21)
- form of support (1)
- forthcoming (1)
- framework (1)
- fund (90)
- fund of funds (2)
- funds (3)
- future developments (1)
- gdp (1)
- gender tracking (1)
- geographic characteristics (1)
- ghg (1)
- green (1)
- green deal (3)
- green tracking (1)
- gross fixed capital formation (1)
- guarantee funds (1)
- guarantees (1)
- health (7)
- health emergencies (1)
- health infrastructure (33)
- healthcare (4)
- heritage (1)
- historic data (4)
- historic payments (6)
- hospitals (2)
- how to (1)
- icu beds (1)
- ijg (1)
- impact (1)
- implementation evaluations (1)
- implemented (9)
- in profile (1)
- index (5)
- indicator (2)
- indicators (9)
- indice (1)
- inequality (2)
- infrastructure (2)
- initial allocation (1)
- initial pre-financing (2)
- inland waterways (1)
- innovation (35)
- integrated (1)
- inter modal (2)
- interim payments (3)
- interreg (2)
- intervention field (18)
- intervention fields (6)
- intervention_fields (1)
- investment progress (4)
- investments (1)
- ip (2)
- ipae (7)
- island (1)
- iti (1)
- jtf (1)
- labour market (32)
- large enterprises (1)
- loan (1)
- loan funds (1)
- loans (1)
- location (1)
- lookup (1)
- low carbon (2)
- low carbon transport (1)
- macro region (1)
- macro-regional and sea basin strategies (1)
- major projects (4)
- maritime safety (1)
- measure level (1)
- medecines (2)
- member state (2)
- member states (1)
- migration (1)
- modelling (5)
- monitoring (1)
- mountain (1)
- mp (4)
- multi modal (2)
- multimodal (33)
- national parks (1)
- natura 2000 (1)
- natural areas (1)
- nature (1)
- new enterprises (1)
- nomenclature des unités territoriales (1)
- non-paper (1)
- nuts (5)
- nuts 2 (1)
- nuts 2 2016 (1)
- nuts 2010 (1)
- nuts 3 (1)
- nuts allocation (1)
- nuts codes (1)
- nuts-2 (8)
- nuts2 (5)
- nuts3 (1)
- operational programme (1)
- operations (2)
- outermost (1)
- outputs (1)
- over programming (1)
- paid (3)
- pandemic (1)
- participation (3)
- payment execution (1)
- payment timeseries (5)
- payments (1)
- peer to peer (1)
- perceptions (1)
- performance (1)
- performance framework (1)
- performance reserve (2)
- performance review (1)
- planned (13)
- planned development (1)
- pollution (1)
- port (1)
- ports (33)
- ppe (1)
- pre-financing (1)
- priority axis (87)
- priority theme (2)
- programme (90)
- programmes (2)
- progress (1)
- project selection (1)
- projects (1)
- public health (2)
- public investment (2)
- r+d activities (2)
- rail (2)
- railway (34)
- rates (2)
- raw data (1)
- rci (5)
- react-eu (3)
- recoveries (3)
- recycling (1)
- region (1)
- regional competitiveness (2)
- regional competitiveness index 2019 (2)
- regional coverage (1)
- regional policy (6)
- regionalised (5)
- regions (1)
- regression (2)
- renewables (1)
- reprogramming (2)
- reprogrammming (1)
- research (36)
- research institutes (1)
- reserve (1)
- resources (1)
- review (1)
- risk prevention (10)
- road (34)
- rtd (1)
- rtd activities (2)
- rtd infrastructure (2)
- rtdi (33)
- rup (1)
- rural (2)
- rural development (1)
- sanitation (1)
- scatterplot (1)
- science parks (2)
- scores (1)
- sdg 6 (1)
- sectoral data (1)
- sectors (2)
- selected (13)
- selected operations (1)
- selection rate (1)
- singaling (1)
- small enterprises (1)
- smart grids (1)
- smart growth (2)
- sme (1)
- sme financing (1)
- smes (38)
- social (1)
- social inclusion (32)
- social progress (1)
- social progress index (2)
- solidarity (2)
- sparsely populated (1)
- specific funds (2)
- specific objective (1)
- spending category (35)
- spi (4)
- start-ups (1)
- storms (2)
- story (2)
- story guide (1)
- strategies (1)
- structural funds (1)
- studies (1)
- success (2)
- sump (1)
- sustainable (3)
- sustainable urban development (1)
- ta (1)
- taiex (1)
- targets (3)
- technical assistance (33)
- technology (1)
- technology institutes (2)
- ten-t (1)
- territorial delivery mechanism (20)
- territorial development (1)
- territorial dimension (20)
- territorial focus (1)
- territory (2)
- territory types (1)
- thematic allocations (1)
- thematic data (1)
- thematic objective (88)
- thematic objectives (1)
- thematic objectives erdf esf cf 2014-2020 (13)
- theme (2)
- themes (1)
- theory based (1)
- theory based evaluation (1)
- time (1)
- time series (1)
- totaluncashedrecoveryamountfromyear (1)
- tourism (10)
- tourist attractions (1)
- track (1)
- transnational (1)
- transport (34)
- uban transport (1)
- universities (2)
- urban (2)
- urban development (1)
- urban mobility (1)
- urban transport (34)
- user guide (1)
- user survey (1)
- user surveysts (1)
- uwwtd (1)
- vaccination (1)
- vaccine (2)
- vaccines (1)
- variation (1)
- vcf (2)
- ventilators (1)
- venture capital (1)
- waste treatment (1)
- waste water (1)
- waste water treatment (33)
- water (1)
- water conservation (1)
- water framework (1)
- water supply (1)
- wellbeing (1)
- working capital (1)
- year (1)
- yei (97)
- yei participants (1)
- z scores (1)